content
stringlengths 611
74.2k
| label
stringclasses 12
values | category
stringclasses 12
values | dataset
stringclasses 1
value | node_id
int64 0
48.4k
| split
stringclasses 3
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Better than the SLRC-1Z Zoom Holster I had originally bought the Case Logic SLR-1Z Zoom Holster to accommodate my D70 with attached Tamron 28-300 lens, however I found that case had too small of an opening for my camera. So I got the SLRC-201 Zoom and it is much better, the differences between the two cases are: SLRC-201 1) Larger opening, camera slips in and out with ease. 2) Main compartment zipper is easier to operate. 3) Hammock suspension system is a better design. 4) Base is sturdier and made of better material. 5) Strap is a little longer. SLR-1Z 1) Strap pad is thicker. 2) Extra pocket on inside flap cover. 3) Although the main zipper is difficult to open, it seems to be more water proof. 4) Has option for belt attachment. Both of these cases are very well made and great for cameras with attached lenses, if you have a smaller SLR then the 1Z will work for you, however the 201 is much better for a larger SLR camera, hope this helps with your decision.
1-hop neighbor's text information: VR is worth it! I own both this one, the Tamron 24-70 VR, and the old Nikon 24-70mm NON-VR, and this is the best, but the Tamron is not too far behind. Physical handling wise, this feels better on the hand, because it is longer and slimmer than the Tamron and is so more balanced. Although both take 82mm filter, it seems for some reason the Nikon feel slimmer on the hand. Picture quality wise, I tried taking pictures with both my Tamron and this Nikon, and the difference was negligible. Of course my review is very non-scientific, but I do like the VR very much. I took a picture at 1/2 second of a piece of paper without VR, and of course, it was very blurry. I took the same picture with VR on, and it was almost perfectly readable. I took a second picture ,and it was 100% readable. Overall, the VR was very good! I would say at least 3-4 stops easily. Autofocusing is very fast......faster and more predicable than the Tamron. Overall, if you are on a budget, I would highly recommend the Tamron which also has VR and I have been using it for more than 1 year. The only problem with the Tamron is autofocus. It will focus perfectly 98% of the time, but you will miss a picture 2% of the time, whereas, with my nikon lens, autofocus is almost 100%. I am not a pro, so I don't mind the 1-2% miss rate. If you are looking to see whether you should upgrade if you have the non-VR Nikon lens, my opinion is a definite yes. Most people don't think VR will help, until they use it. Before, without my Tamron, I was very nervous using my nikon indoors without flash. There was always a chance of blur. With this new lens, I am very confident using it shutter at 1/30 or even 1/15. At speed under this, I am still able to get some very sharp images, but I would check and possibly take a second picture to be sure. In conclusion, VR is highly recommended. If you are on a budget, get the Tamron. If you are thinking whether you need to upgrade to VR, I highly recommend you do. This is a very nice, but expensive lens.
1-hop neighbor's text information: The D500 is great (disregard nay-sayers) First of all, I didn't buy this camera on Amazon. I bought it elsewhere because I knew I could get it faster there (proof of purchase in pics). Secondly, all of the negative reviews I read so far should be disregarded, or better yet, deleted. I don't care if it's "just an opinion." If you're misrepresenting the strengths of this camera because it won't connect with your iOS device or because it's not a FX body, than keep it to yourself. People want true reviews, not crybaby reviews over non-issues. Snapbridge is delayed on iOS. There is no false advertising. It was announced at the initial launch that a delay was happening for iOS. This is also Nikon's first DX flagship in almost a decade. A lot of folks who held on to the still relevant D300S have been asking for this and now we have it. Some people rather have a DX body for their type of shooting, if you're complaining that Nikon didn't release another (ANOTHER) FX body, the D500 is obviously not for you. Speaking on the FX/DX debate, true, actual owners of the D500 should already know that the D500 really closed that difference gap. The overall imagery is great. The noise handling is surprisingly on-par with some FX bodies like the D750, and all the nerd tests from DPR show that in some settings, the D500 is beating the D5 in handling ISO and maintaining a clean, sharp image. The D500 (for those not in the know) is aimed at sports and wildlife photographers, and it's impressive in that regard, but I found it equally impressive in FX-related photography like landscape (I shoot LE astrophotography), and portraits. The Auto AF Fine-Tune is invaluable, quick, and easy to use. The new tilt screen (it's a new version from the D750) is rigid and tough. The touchscreen is accurate, and intuitive. The inclusion of an XQD slot makes this wicked fast. I was able to clear the 200 shot buffer without any slowdown with the Lexar Pro x2933 at 14-bit RAW, and the photos finished loading the 200 shots to the card anywhere between 7 - 10 seconds. the OVF is 100% coverage and is bright. I was able to tack-sharp focus a star with just the viewfinder. Overall, the images are nice and sharp, BUT at times, they're not as sharp as a D7200 or my D7100. You can thank the 20mp sensor for that (compared to the 24mp sensor in the D7100/7200). EDIT (8/20): Since somebody else had to exclaim that I was wrong about IQ differences between the 71/7200 (7100 mainly) and the D500 in their review, perhaps some clarifying is in order. Yes, the D500 performs in this department well at higher ISOs than the D7100. That doesn't mean that the D500 is the end-all winner. I've compared landscape dusk shots I've taken with my D7100 and then with the D500. I also have a 4k monitor, which is a pixel-peepers dream. As much as I hate pixel peeping, a number of the shots I've taken on the D7100 were overall better than the same shots I took with the D500. I guess I should say that at times and certain conditions, the D500 has better IQ but at other times, it's just not.... imo. In any case, I don't care too much about that because I work with the gear that I got and I hold onto said gear for as long as I can. I make sure my fundamentals are in order, I exercise what I learned The D7100 was an anomaly purchase because some of us have been waiting for a D300S replacement for years.. I mean, I still shoot film with my old F3 and FE and push film. Fundamentals>Gear. Despite that, this whole image deal is really only an issue with people who obsessed with pixel peeping and doesn't embrace imperfections such as noise. Overall, wildlife photos are still sharp and the photos are still good enough for decent sized prints. The 4k is detailed, and the 1080p recording is combo'd with Electronic VR, which works pretty decent. My only two issues with this camera is the additional crop-factor you get when filming in 4K. It is doable, since it's pretty much the same crop as MFT sensors, but I prefer a wide lens for 4k filming. The other issue is battery. It sucks up way more battery life than the D7100/D7200. Even with Airplane Mode on, the camera seems to suck battery life at a faster rate than my previous bodies. Also, for now, if you need an extra battery, you have to buy legit EN-EL15s because none of the 3rd party batteries work. This is a GREAT camera. Well worth the wait. Go with what kind of photography you mostly shoot with and get the gear you think works best for you. Don't play trial and error with your money and then cry and needlessly give a good camera bad reviews.
Target text information: This is a very good case for my new Nikon D500 camera This is a very good case for my new Nikon D500 camera. Unfortunately, it did not fit the camera with the 18-300 mm lens attached. It did fit with my 18-105 mm older lens, so I decided to keep it. I called Nikon who said it would work and I took measurements, so I knew it would be close.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
5
|
Bags & Cases
|
photo
| 39,518
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: I expected a bit of a boost in recharge rate, but nothing like this. With this in between my Godox PB960 and Nikon external power cable, my SB800 was able to keep up with my D600 at its max frame rate of 5FPS. Obviously I can only do it in bursts for fear of melting the lens on the flash, nor do I need it (I just got tired of my flash eating AA batteries like candy), but it still gives you an idea as to how it's affected the recharge rate. I did a lot of reading before I decided to try messing with external battery packs for my flash, and the major problems I've seen references to have all been regarding the cables. Only time will tell whether this will last, or end up in the trash bin.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Really recommend this softbox This very well constructed,. The build is really solid. the rods seem to be reinforced. Really recommend this softbox. Am including some images of my setup, I had made a custom bracket to use with a regular umbrella because I want my speedlight to be in the center, light is more even. and result of my first shoot.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Awesome strap, clever connectors and very soft seat belt ... Awesome strap, clever connectors and very soft seat belt material for the strap. My only gripe is with the metal adjusters. When I put my camera in my sling and stuff the strap in with it, the strap adjusters scratch the camera. Would have been better with a rubberized coating on them or maybe velcro tabs to cover them. Love the strength and industrial look of the quick adjusters so a love/hate situation for sure.
Target text information: I love this light! I've coveted the Quantum Q-flash for easily portable location shooting for a long time, but could never bring myself to pay the price. Not only is the Q-flash very expensive, but all the accessories are costly as well. A light, battery pack, and a few modifiers will set you back well over $1000. I saw the Streaklight last weekend and it seemed to have everything I was looking for at a much lower price point. After checking the few reviews I could find online, I bought one with the full complement of accessories. I'm glad I did. The construction quality of the Streaklight inspires confidence. The hot shoe seems plenty strong enough for the weight of the light and modifiers. The head rotates 335 degrees, tilts from about 15 degrees down to straight up, and locks securely into every position. The weight is a little heavier than my SB-800's when loaded with batteries. (The streaklight requires an external battery pack.) The controls are very simple, and intuitive to operate. Lighting performance is very good. The output power is ridiculous for a shoe-mount flash. It has a published GN of 262' with the standard reflector and no diffusers (about 4 times the output power of the Q-flash), but mine doesn't quite achieve that output. At full power I'm getting about 235' out of mine (as measured by my Sekonic L-508). Coverage is really even over about 24mm on a 35mm camera. With the umbrella reflector (sold separately) I can evenly light the full coverage of my 16mm lens (the widest full-frame I own) and only lose about 1.3 stops. Outdoors you can overpower direct sunlight, even on very wide scenes. The output power is adjustable to 1/128th by 1/3 stops, and is consistent and predictable at all settings. Color temperature was between 5600 and 5700K, which is a little cooler than my other strobes and shoe-mount flashes, but it's not likely to show in your images if you mix light sources, and it's consistent at different power levels (unlike one of my import studio strobes.) The PB 960 battery pack has a cheaper feel, but has the virtue of being light and seems to pack plenty of power. After firing hundreds of test shots this weekend, the meter still indicated full power and recycle times were the same as at full charge. The pack has two output ports, and can be used to power two separate lights or recycle a single light more quickly (using an optional cord). Using one port, recycle time at full power was between 5 and 6 seconds. Using two ports it was reduced to 3 seconds. Using two ports at 1/4 power or less (still far brighter than my SB-800's) recycling is nearly instantaneous. Cords are also available for this battery pack to power common OEM speedlights. I've got one on the way. The streaklight wireless remote is wonderful. Like the flash, the remote is very intuitve to operate. In addition to triggering, it can also adjust the output power, turn flash off, and turn on an AF assist lamp. It works at 433Mhz, has 16 channels, and support 16 groups. Yes, that's 16 groups. How creative do you care to get? I was able to use the full 1/250 sync speed at full power on my D800, and I didn't miss a single shot or power level change in hundreds of attempts. Just to see what I could do, I successfully triggered the Streaklight in my basement 10 straight times from my above-grade, detached garage about 80' away. I like my RadioPopper JRX's, but this performed way better. The receiver is powered from the flash unit, and the transmitter takes 2 AA batteries, so unlike my Radiopoppers, I'll have no trouble finding unusual battery types. (If the manufacturer is reading this, please make a receiver for Nikon speedlights similar to the JRX. I'll buy three in a heartbeat.) The Streaklight also supports slave triggering in both S1 & S2 modes. S2 ignores TTL preflashes, but I didn't test this mode. S1 sensitivity was very good. Finally, repeating mode and high-speed sync are also supported, but I didn't test either. Flashpoint modifiers are acceptable quality for the price. Fit and finish isn't what you'd find on the name brands, but they fit well, work well, and don't seem fragile. I don't know what the Quantum modifiers are like, but another reviewer I found indicated that they fit the Streaklight. The only advantage I can see of the Q-flash is TTL support. I personally rarely use TTL, even more rarely use it off-camera, and never use it in multi-light set-ups, so I don't miss it at all. The size and weight of this unit probably means it won't replace your OEM speedlight for direct attachment to your camera, but you could use it that way if you have a need. I think of this as more of a replacement for big studio strobes and heavy battery packs for on-location shooting. You could put two of these, a couple light stands, a couple battery packs, and an assortment of soft-boxes or umbrellas in a gym bag that weighs under 15 lbs. If you're still reading this obscenely long review, you're probably seriously considering this flash. Buy one. You won't be disappointed.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
7
|
Flashes
|
photo
| 14,341
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Good image quality and sturdy construction. <a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Reolink-RLC-410S-4-Megapixel-1440P-2560x1440-POE-Security-IP-Camera-Built-in-16GB-Micro-SD-Card-Outdoor-Waterproof-Bullet-Night-Vision-65-100ft-Viewing-Angle-80-E-mail-Alert-FTP-upload-ONVIF/dp/B016UCNPEE/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Reolink RLC-410S 4-Megapixel 1440P 2560x1440 POE Security IP Camera Built-in 16GB Micro SD Card, Outdoor Waterproof Bullet, Night Vision 65-100ft Viewing Angle 80 E-mail Alert, FTP upload, ONVIF</a> Pro: The camera body has high quality construction. The shell looks like casted iron with white paint. Heavy duty quality for outdoor usage. The image quality is good. Cons: The Apple App can not be downloaded from USA region. My i-tune account is in USA, so the App is NOT available. I ended up using the CD ROM in the box to install the software in my PC. Another issue is my PC connected to internet by WiFi, so the auto-add camera function is not working both in LAN & WAN. I have to manually add the camera by UID (the text code under the 2D bar code on the cam). The camera needs both the DC power (AC/DC adapter provided in the box) and the Ethernet cable to function, so I can not install this cam too far away from the power plug. I have not tried the motion sensor alert function. I received this product at a discounted rate in exchange for my honest review.
1-hop neighbor's text information: This product works great. it has more functionality than the sellers seem ... This product works great. it has more functionality than the sellers seem to realize based on the lack of answers to questions that I asked before receiving. The question that in my opinion that is most unanswered is, Is there a way to extend the network for further out cameras, as these connect back to the NVR unit rather than to your home/office WiFi connection that you can extend by installing more access points. This question was not directly answered when I asked it, and searching thru other questions, they seem to suggest buying an "extended range antenna" that I suspect is an antenna on a cord that you place closer to the NVR unit. The functionality that this product offers that the sellers don't seem to understand is, the cameras are able to function as repeaters as well, up to 3 units out. So you can have one camera (camera A) communicating directly with the NVR, a further out (camera B) Connecting to Camera A, and a further out yet (camera C) that connects to Camera B. To configure this, before installing the cameras that would potentially be out of range of the NVR, power all cameras on, Right click on the screen in the NVR, choose Video Manage, select "Repeater" from the bottom right hand side, and adjust the camera tree from to change the communication path. In the attached picture, I have Camera 1 and Camera 2 talk to the NVR directly, Camera 3 talks through Camera 1, and Camera 4 the furthers out camera communicates through 3 back to 1, to the NVR. It looks like there may also be a possibility of setting up WiFi Extenders on the NVR Wi-Fi network, however I have not had a need to play around with this functionality as my cameras are able to act as repeaters. If I get a chance to test this functionality I will come back and update this review with my findings.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great product for the price I'm overall very happy with my purchase. Easy install, directions are more of a side note it's so easy to install. Picture quality is good and play back is smooth. I did have one camera that the IR didn't want to work but after contacting seller and doing their trouble shooting the replaced the camera free of charge! Email response was quick...sent email at 1145pm had responses by 130am. I've been running this for a month with no issue
Target text information: Great Buy I have had the system for the last 2 months now. One camera (night vision) did go out however customer service through TMEZON was great and sent me a new one right away. I have owned a few other systems and this one by far has the best picture. Night vision is pretty good, and the camera quality is much better then most others!
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
0
|
Video Surveillance
|
photo
| 27,205
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Superb Camera This is a superb camera. I grew tired of always having to lug around one of my DSLRs anytime I went out so I started looking at a few Point and Shoot options. I decided to buy the Canon Powershot 720 HS after reading some of the reviews on Amazon, and I am extremely satisfied with my purchase. The camera is compact and elegant and feels wonderful in your hand. It is a fully manual camera that allows you to set the ISO, aperture, and shutter speed, which is exactly what I was looking for in a Point and Shoot. The camera has a 40X zoom lens, but do not try to zoom out too far without mounting the camera on a tripod or stabilizing it another way. The image quality is excellent, and if you don't tell anyone the images came from a Point and Shoot, theyd easily think they came from a mid-range DSLR with a good lens. Ive had the camera now for a few weeks, and Ive tested it both in the daytime and nighttime. In bright daylight, images come out crisp and richly saturated. At night, the camera performs well, especially if you use a tripod. I rarely use any of my DSLRs at night without a tripod unless Im using a lens with a really wide aperture, so Ive grown accustomed to mounting my cameras on tripods. You can get very sharp, high-quality images with this camera at night if you mount the camera. Youre able to do exposures lasting up to 15 seconds, and the images look great. I have not tested the video capabilities of the camera yet, but I will get to it eventually. For me, video capture is a nice option to have, but not something I am really interested in at this point. My main focus (pun intended) is taking still images. If you're looking for a high-quality, elegant Point and Shoot, this is the camera. I am planning on traveling a lot soon, and I think I am going to leave home all of my DSLRs and lenses and just bring this camera with me. Sometimes less is more, especially with a powerful little camera like this one.
1-hop neighbor's text information: The case looks really good. The color looks good as well The case looks really good. The color looks good as well. I like having the camera accessible at all time while still having it safe from scratches and bumps. The man made leather looks like real leather.
1-hop neighbor's text information: 5 Stars except for the insecure cover snap. I like the smart look of this case that is a perfect fit for my Canon SX 700 HS. The stitching is fine and even. The strap is proper length to either sling over shoulder or wear in front over neck. Having read many of these reviews before buying I can say that complaints about the split cowhide leather have no merit. It is very strong and the "PU Leather" finish is the same used on high fashion leather accessories. Without the finish it would be suede. Full-grain cowhide would be OK for boots and saddles but far too thick for a case such as this. The hardware (rivets and loops) are robust and secure. The leather strap is sewn to a nylon extension with buckles which, if properly configured, will not come loose. One minor problem is that the the edge of the left side of the case obscures the framing assist/seek button. However, once you know where it is, the leather is pliable enough to allow you to operate this feature simply by pressing over it. The camera's pop-up flash release toggle is quite close to the edge of the case but is easy enough to operate. The camera is held securely inside the case by a the tripod adapter that fits the camera and also provides an external threaded socket for the tripod. Its knob is knurled and it takes only 2 1/2 easy turns to remove or secure the camera. The camera must be removed from the case to change batteries or access the memory card, digital USB AV out and HDMI ports. So why only 4 stars? Users' concerns about the inadequate holding power of the brass snaps that hold the cover seem to be well-founded. i assumed that maybe this was a sample defect so took a chance. The cover on my case fell to the ground the first time I unsnapped it from the front. On a windy day it almost blew into the lake. One time I let it sit on the ground while I continued shooting and forgot about it and had to walk back to retrieve it. It seems that this is more a design flaw than a random defect. I tried putting a layer of aluminum foil over the snap but it did not reinforce the closure and fell out anyway. The best design would have been a very secure snap or a swivel for the (right bottom) snap that holds the back of the cover. The (left bottom) snap that holds the front of the cover is about the same strength but it is under no stress and remains closed. My solution was to tie a piece of mono-filament fishing line to the tab for the back snap and tie the other end to the leather strap that holds the neck strap. Not a very elegant arrangement, so I would like to hear from others that found a more aesthetic way to secure the front of the case when the camera is in use, other than stowing it in ones's pocket-- it is a bit too large for most pockets!
Target text information: I really like it! It is really classy looking I bought this case before I went on a trip to Europe. I really like it! It is really classy looking, although it is not real leather. the only bad thing I would say about it is that the front flap covering the lens gets a little annoying, as you have to take it off every time you take a picture.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
5
|
Bags & Cases
|
photo
| 44,646
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Five Stars Always a reliable product!
1-hop neighbor's text information: Five Stars Ok
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great Bag That Fits The C100/C300 I was looking for a bag that fit my C100's fully assembled and stumbled onto a video talking about the Petrol DR003 bag only to discover that Petrol is no more and Sachtler bought them out. The "very few" videos that Sachtler has out about this line of bags were a little vague but I needed 2 bags so I held my breath and rolled the dice to see if it was worth the price and fit the C100/C300 cameras. Well, let me assure you, this little doc bag is AMAZING. Great quality! Opens all the way up like a doctor bag (high and wide), has the light in it like the Petrol bag video I saw and most importantly, fits the C100 fully assembled. I have a quick release plate on mine that makes it sit up a little higher but it still fits (barely but fits). If you were wondering, wonder no more. The ONLY thing that I wished they had included was the extra pad for the bottom of the bag for extra camera protection but this bag is such good quality, I'm not even going to burn a star for it. As soon as I get a few more bucks, I'll buy another one for my other Canon. Well done Sachtler.
Target text information: Five Stars If this bag were any roomier I would live inside of it. Ha ha!
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
5
|
Bags & Cases
|
photo
| 32,967
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Possibly a bad sample? I was surprised to find, after reading so many positive reviews of this lens, that the copy I received was so fuzzy at wide-open apertures that I could see it on UN-MAGNIFIED images right on my D90's 3" screen. All lenses lose sharpness at wide apertures: this is a matter of basic physics and is the result of something called spherical aberration. Some are much better than others though, thanks to better optical designs that more effectively correct for this tendency. The 35mm f/2, for example, is very good wide open; the 85mm f/1.8 is decent (and very appropriate for portrait use). My copy of the 50mm f/1.8 lost both sharpness and significant contrast as f/1.8 was approached. I would quantify it as follows: f/1.8: very fuzzy (well beyond "soft"), reduced contrast, almost un-useable f/2.8: still quite soft, much improved contrast f/4: slightly soft, good contrast f/5.6: sharp, good contrast f/8: very sharp, good contrast These results were repeatable on my sample and held true regardless of shutter speed and technique. Notes: - The advantage of a lens like this is the ability to use wide apertures. A good portrait lens need not be particularly sharp, but wider than f/4 my copy of this lens was soft enough that I would use it for nothing other than casual people-photography. It would not suffice for critical night or low-light photography, or for general photography where sharpness might be desired. For photos of people it was fine at f/2.8, but below that it lost so much sharpness, and enough contrast, that photos of almost any subject looked dull. - The lens seems like an obvious choice as a first prime due to its price and the many excellent reviews of it here on Amazon and elsewhere. Even besides the sharpness degradation wide open, I found it less useful than I'd hoped. On a crop-size DSLR, it is a short telephoto lens, and it just hasn't turned out to be a focal length I use all that much. I would urge potential buyers to consider the 35mm f/2 before this lens as it gives the traditional "normal" perspective on a Nikon crop-size DSLR. - Some reviewers like this lens for portrait use, but again, I found it poorly suited for this. The 85mm f/1.8 is admittedly more expensive, but it has far more potential as a portrait lens. - This is not a high-contrast lens. It does not use any ED glass elements, which seem to be quite magical at improving contrast, and color rendition is noticeably less vibrant than such lenses. For some types of photography this can actually be desirable, but for general or landscape photography I prefer the higher-contrast lenses. - My sample of this lens may have been below average, considering that most reviews of the lens are very positive. However, if you read carefully, most thorough reviews do mention that it loses contrast and acuity at wide apertures. Ken Rockwell, for example, has reviewed the lens very positively, but when it came time to suggest lenses sharp enough to be used on the new D3x, with its ultra-high-resolution sensor, he gave the similar-performing (possibly better) f/1.4 "G" version only three stars. I would submit that it is really not quite as sharp a lens as its reputation would lead one to believe. My excellent 16-85mm DX zoom, for example (the only lens I've given a five-star review as of this time), is far sharper than this lens up to around f/8 and hold an edge even there and beyond. - Nikon has recently announced a new 35mm f/1.8 DX lens. I've ordered one and will probably post a review once I've had a chance to use it. I would suggest that it is very likely to be a better choice than this lens for almost any DX user. Being designed for the smaller DX sensor, it will probably be optimized for high linear resolutions within the smaller DX image circle. It is also a fairly inexpensive lens, not much more than this lens now that the 50mm has crept up a bit in price. - Even if my sample is significantly poorer than average, my experience indicates that it would be a good idea to thoroughly test a copy of this lens before committing to buy it. Be sure to compare images at wide apertures to those made at f/8, where sharpness should be very good, and determine for yourself whether the loss of sharpness and contrast is acceptable for your purposes. - Focus is plenty quick and accurate, at least on my sample. No problems at all in this regard (and none expected).
1-hop neighbor's text information: Excellent all-purpose lens This lens is very well-made and takes wonderful pictures. To address the most common questions people ask before they take the plunge: Price: No, it's not usually this expensive. I paid around $400 for mine, but I got it a couple of months ago. Apparently Nikon is having a hard time making enough of these. Rather than rewarding the greedy opportunists who are now charging exorbitant prices for this lens, I suggest calling local and smaller camera shops - they are much more likely to have one sitting on the shelves. It's absolutely worth about $500, but I wouldn't pay more than that. The Sigma (very similar, see below) is a better value at that point. Image quality: Great. Slightly soft and glowy at 1.4, but that's to be expected. Gets quite sharp at 2.8. The Sigma is even softer at 1.4 than this lens, so if wide-open sharpness is important to you, this is your lens. Bokeh: Nice, but a little jittery at 1.4 on specular highlights. This means that if you have any light sources or sharp point reflections in the out-of-focus area behind your subject, you will see little light rings around the round blob. These disappear at f2, and they don't really bother me. They are a side effect of correcting spherical aberration in the image - lens manufacturers have to make tough choices sometimes, and Nikon apparently chose wide-open image correction over the absolute best bokeh possible in this circumstance. Compared to other lenses: not quite as nice as the Sigma 50/1.4 wide open, but you get a sharper in-focus area, so it's a trade-off. Not really able to compete with the 85/1.4 or the 105/2 DC, but that's not surprising - those lenses have a much longer focal length. Focusing: Fast and precise. To be sure, at 1.4, the depth of field (especially at closer focusing distances) is RAZOR thin, so focusing just isn't possibly going to be spot-on every time. I frequently use manual focus, and even a TINY, TINY nudge on the focus ring moves the plane of sharp focus about one-half inch at those distances, so it's extremely hard to get perfect focus exactly where you want it to be. Be prepared to have some patience, or use live view, if you plan to take close-up shots at 1.4 and you want perfect focus. Most amateurs won't notice if things are slightly out of focus, so not generally a problem unless you're a perfectionist. If you're a constant autofocus user you will not even be aware of this issue. Speaking of up-close focus, I will mention that I feel this lens has a fairly short focusing distance, which is nice - you can really get in nice and tight on subjects and come up with some really attention-getting compositions with neat depth-of-field effects. It's no macro, but I'm constantly amazed at just how close I can get to things. Low-light performance: Stellar. That's really why I bought this lens, as I already have several amazing lenses for portraiture/bokeh. I love this lens for events where I have room to move around (it's a little long in focal length for tightly-packed spaces) because I hate using flash if it's not necessary. This lens and a slight ISO boost is all you need to take flash-free pictures in many settings. Build quality: Good. Not like Nikon's professional-grade lenses, but very sturdy - I can't foresee any possible problems. The plastic hood is a twist-on bayonet type, and it works well but can be slightly annoying at times. Lack of VR: Not a big deal - you shouldn't need VR for a 50mm lens at this aperture; it is easily possible to get to a reasonable shutter speed so that shake isn't a problem. On an APS-C sensor, I'd aim for at least 1/60 second if you want blur-free images. At 1/125 second, you'd have to be going through an earthquake to see any shake with this lens, because it just doesn't have enough focal length to make that a problem. Besides, would you really want to pay $200 more for a 50mm prime? Nikon would have to make this a 1.2 for that to make sense to most people. I think the decision to leave VR off this lens was a good one.
Target text information: Great Set Not only do you get a set of filters an extra battery and a stable tripod but the 50 mm f1.8 is an essentially fast and quintessential part any lens system for the budding photographer. Having less moving parts than your standard zoom lenses, prime lenses have increased clarity and often are capable to allow a lot more light in to achieve even faster speeds in low light conditions. Definitely worth adding to your arsenal if your a nikon shooter.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 13,097
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Canon 70D First Impressions This is going to be short, since I've not had the chance to do a whole lot of shooting as yet. Consider it a "just out of the box" impression. I already have a Canon 5D Mk III, and a number of L series lenses. I wanted a "backup camera" for video shooting, and I was intrigued by the new auto-focus system offered on the 70D. So far, I'm extremely pleased with this camera. The 18-35 mm kit lens gives a lot of range, and I tested the camera out with my other lenses. The L series lenses work very well, and auto-focusing is fast, smooth, and doesn't search around much even in very low light. The camera is not as heavy as the 5D Mk III, but feels solid enough, and not all that different in the hands. Even with the 70-300mm f4-5.6L IS USM zoom - my heaviest lens at the moment - the camera feels surprisingly balanced. The crop sensor obviously changes the effect of the lenses, but having a full sensor and a crop sensor both, it's like having 2 sets of lenses. My 70-300mm zoom now has an effective reach up to 480 mm (on the Canon 70D) due to the crop factor of 1.6. To me, this is kind of a bonus, though not in itself a reason to buy the camera. Smaller sized sensors result in an apparent increase in focal length, and a greater depth of field, but this is a generalization and each lens has its own properties that affect the image as well. Read the reviews of individual lenses when considering how each one reacts to different types of camera bodies. The main thing to take note of is that while the Canon 70D will accept all the EF and EF-L lenses, it is designed to use the EF-S series lenses as well. In fact, the EF-S series lenses are custom tailored specifically for the Canon 70D and (as far as I know) other APS-C crop sensor cameras made by Canon. These lenses - and the kit lens is one of them - will not work on a full frame camera like the Canon 5D mkIII; the rear element extends back into the camera body in a way that makes it impossible to attach lenses of this series to full frame sensor cameras. Even if they could be attached, I suspect the captured image might suffer from serious vignetting and other problems. For a thorough understanding of how the APS-C, full frame and other types of sensors interact with various lenses, I highly recommend doing some research on the web. There's a lot of good information out there, and this is a fairly involved subject that I don't even want to attempt to dive into here :) One thing I couldn't figure out before having the camera in my possession deserves a mention. This is my first experience with a fold-out LCD screen on a DSLR, and I had no idea how the display would deal with flipping around 180 degrees. Would it be upside down? This was the first thing I tried, and the screen auto-flips when it is rotated. Maybe everyone else already knows this - but I didn't! Anyway, the fold-out display is a great feature, and it also folds face-in to protect the display when not in use. The ability to touch various points on the LCD display while in Live View or shooting video, and shift focus while shooting is - to me at least - worth the price of admission. If Canon eventually updates the 7D and/or the 5D Mk III, this functionality would be most welcome! Purely as a "gut reaction" - I really like the 70D immensely. And it seems a very good value for the price. This may actually become my preferred "walk-around camera, though time will tell. EDIT - 10/22/2013: I've spent a lot more time with the camera now, so I can add to my earlier comments. While I purchased the 70D mainly for shooting video, I recently used it to shoot bracketed exposures for HDR (high dynamic range) panoramas. A friend of mine had a nodal camera head (The "Ninja" head) which allowed for precise rotation of the camera to cover a full 360 degree field-of-view. The Canon 70D allows for up to 7 bracketed exposures via the AEB controls. The plates were shot in the RAW (CR2) format, using the kit lens, and stitched together using PTGui software. After some initial trial runs, where we ironed out the kinks in the whole process, the results were exceptional. For those who may be wondering "why do you want a 32 bit HDR 360 panorama at 10k-16k resolution?" it is used to create realistic lighting and reflections in a 3D/CG software (i.e. Modo or Maya, for example). The 3D scene can be lit entirely by the 360 panoramic image, producing a very convincing result. At any rate, the Canon 70D delivered terrific results doing something I didn't even foresee when I bought the camera. I will try and upload some of the tests (where the photographic panorama serves as both background and light-source) if I can figure out how to do so on the Amazon site. EDIT - 11/9/2013: A note to anyone who intends to shoot green screen (for color keyed composites) or do precise color grading in post production: The video output from the 70D is not YCbCr 4:2:2 compression. This is not apparent to the naked eye when viewing the video footage, but it becomes an issue when attempting to work with the footage in a post environment. The firmware update for the Canon 5D addressed this problem by enabling 4:2:2 color output via the HDMI port to an external recording device (I use the Atomos Ninja 2 for this) but currently uncompressed "clean" HDMI is not enabled on the Canon 70D. I have my fingers crossed this will be dealt with in an update to the firmware. This is not a huge issue unless you intend to do extensive manipulation of your video footage in post production, but it is something to consider with this camera and DSLRs in general. There are workarounds, of course, but that can entail a fair amount of time & effort, particularly when extracting color key mattes (masks) involving fine edge detail or areas of transparency. That being said, the footage is nevertheless beautiful. And I suspect this technical point should not be an issue for most people considering buying the Canon 70D. The CR2 (camera raw) files are not at all affected by this, it's a factor limited to the HD video.
Target text information: Best value for money bundle! Personally I think this is one of the best kits available on Amazon. This is my first DSLR-camera purchase. I have been using this bundle for almost a month now. The lenses (Canon 18-55 & 55-250mm) are very good for kit lenses and I chose them after long hours spent on reading reviews of various options. 70D is a powerful crop-sensor body with awesome technology, so the last thing l would want to do is to buy low quality lenses for it. 70D is compatible also with L-series lenses(red stripes/for when you wanna invest harder). Some of the stuff on the bundle are a small let down ex. the tripod which can't hold up the cameras weight even with 18-55 attached. Otherwise a great starter bundle!! Next step: gradually upgrading and increasing my gear.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
8
|
Digital Cameras
|
photo
| 15,632
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Does not fit my mount! The product gets 5 stars for function and price. I've not tested its tracking accuracy as of this date. Here is the reason: I called Orion (actually I used their on-line chat). I asked if this would work with an older Orion Skyview Deluxe EQ mount. After the person checked, he came back and said "yes"! I ordered the drive from Amazon because they were $20 less than direct from Orion. I got it and guess what? IT DOES NOT FIT! No way, no how! Apparently there are no drives which fit my old mount. Fortunately I have my own machine shop. I'm currently making mounting brackets and shaft extenders. I know I will get this to work eventually. So, if you've got an old mount like mine, DO NOT BUY THIS MOUNT! If you've got a newer mount, you should be OK. Get it in writing from Orion!
1-hop neighbor's text information: Way too expensive -- for items you won't use. I've been an amateur astronomer for over 50 years. Plus, I've tested and reviewed telescopes, accessories, and eyepieces for major companies, so I'm pretty sure I know what to look for and recommend. There's good and bad stuff out there, and it isn't always easy for novices to get a grip on the difference, without either using an item, or finding an accurate report about it. First of all folks, please know that a "lens" is the glass on the business-end of a refractor telescope, or the optic on your CAMERA. The thing you attach to a telescope is called an "EYEPIECE" -- not a "lens". Secondly, any "set" of eyepieces is generally going to be 90 percent useless. That's because most of the higher powered eyepieces in the set will only get used once or twice -- until you finally realize that high powers are only useful on a telescope if you're in a VERY DARK LOCATION, with almost perfect sky conditions (an extremely rare combination!). These eyepieces are all 4-element Plossl's -- a very old and very basic design, but very tried-and-true for general observing. The 32mm is the best in the set, and probably the one you'll use the most. The 2X Barlow is of average quality, but can be very useful -- it'll turn the 32mm into a 16mm without cutting eye-relief (good, if you wear glasses). The Moon filter is a necessity if you want to do any lunar observing. Only one or two of the color filters will be useful. So what we have here, is one useful eyepiece, a 2X Barlow, a Moon filter, and a color filter or two -- for which you'd pay a lot less by purchasing just those items SEPERATELY. And if you shop smart, you'll find a high-quality 32mm Plossl and a 2X Barlow -- Televue for example, are hands-down the best production optics available! They're generally more expensive, but well worth the investment. Celestron makes excellent telescopes!! My 6SE is a remarkable piece of engineering, and has World Class optics. But I use eyepieces of World Class quality to complement it, and I get awesome results. [NOTE]: These are not Celestron's "Feature" eyepieces -- they are their "accessory" eyepieces, and like Meade's accessory EP's they are only of average quality, and are usually way overpriced, like most Meade/Celestron accessories. My advice is to save for a Televue 32mm or 25mm Plossl, ($110 to $135 online) and 2X Barlow, ($115) and buy a Moon filter online from a reputable dealer (Orion offers an excellent Moon filter [#05662] for about $15, which I've been using since 1997). It'll all work out to cost a little more, but you'll find that you'll actually use them. [NOTE]: I rarely use color-filters. But the ones I do use are the Orion #80A and #82A. You won't need much more for general observing. [TIP]: The best way to store and carry eyepieces, is in "Eyepiece Canisters" -- clear poly screw-top containers made for that purpose. They're available online (I get mine from Oceanside Photo & Telescope) for $2 to $3 each. Put them all in a backpack or travel bag, along with your red flashlight, dew heaters, gloves, and Lance crackers. Much easier!! Better yet, I use a shooter's Range Bag (from MidwayUSA). They have roomy external zippered pockets and internal compartments. Plus they're well padded. Perfect!! Celestron Accessory Kit NOT RECOMMENDED 2 Stars .
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great mount and tripod hampered by 1990's battery pack as only power source I would rate the mount and tripod as 5 stars, as it is quite sturdy and even has decent and usable setting circles. But the only way to power this mount is an optional Orion battery pack using 4 D-cell batteries - in other words, a 6v power source. The electronics cannot handle other 6v transformers as they often actually deliver an output up to 10v, which will fry the Orion motor drives. But a more serious issue is that the solder connections for the battery pack are REALLY cheap, and cannot be re-soldered again if the connection is broken. I went through a set of 4 batteries every week due to a lot of public astronomy outreach, and that got both annoying and a little expensive, so I reluctantly sold my SkyView Pro mount. I will say though that the motorized tracking the batteries provided was VERY accurate. But this mount is in dire need of a 21st century upgrade so it can run off both AC power and a Celestron Power Tank, instead of a cheesy plastic battery holder with flimsy connections.
Target text information: Important supplement to your Meade LX70 Tracks very well. Can't tell if the motor introduces some jitter or if it's just "bad seeing", but I notice a periodic movement in objects, however it's on par with what I normally see during turbulent skies.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 40,949
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Perfect! I vlog, a lot... especially at conventions and concerts. Most places are banning selfie sticks for being hazardous, annoying etc. this is perfect for keeping it much more stable than my hand and allowing sound to go to my canon vixia mini! Small enough for being convenient but does an amazing job at keeping the camera less shakey without being a super fancy stabilizer
1-hop neighbor's text information: Professional Stabilizer for a fair price! This is perfect! I bought the (gopro) version, and it's exactly what i need. good, A sturdy professional stabilizer! Very satisfied. Shipping was very quick too. ** But, My only problem is that, The (1/4 attachment) is a little loose now. I've used it with a standard LED camera light (as seen in photo) and now it's just a little jiggly. Its just an (annoyance) for me..
1-hop neighbor's text information: Fortunately for me one of the balance hole threads were ... <div id="video-block-R20O5QIILRRLAF" class="a-section a-spacing-small a-spacing-top-mini video-block"></div><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/C1hpB8Sr-VS.mp4" class="video-url"><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/A1GGI5W4C2S.png" class="video-slate-img-url"> Yeah baby...this Neewer stabilizer rocks!!! Bought the Yaekoo (Roxant knock-off) stabilizer first and it was a total bear to set-up balance! Really, took forevvvver! Fortunately for me one of the balance hole threads were stripped out so I ended up returning the defective unit anyway. Then I bought the Neewer... Night and day! Night and day!!! So easy to set-up balance compared to the Yaekoo! Works awesome like I'm gliding on air! I highly recommend the Neewer stabilizer! Good quality and works wonderfully!!!
Target text information: Five Stars Its very strong feels good I love it I use it out side all the time
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 45,230
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Nicely made. Puts out a ton of light. Uses a GoPro battery. Nicely made.
Target text information: pink filtrr Light seem very bright and comes with all the attachments to connect to a Go Pro. I will be using this light for diving but have not had a chance to take it deep. Also the red filter which I will be using for diving is not actually red. It's more a light pink tone which is not useful. I will adjust my review as I take it deep and possibly ask for a ref filter.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
4
|
Lighting & Studio
|
photo
| 37,765
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great Battery! The Energizer EL1CR2BP Lithium Photo Battery has a long-life 3-volt CR2-size lithium battery, designed for use in photographic devices, also for use in calculators, memory backup, pocket pagers, watches,and delivers endurance and reliability in high and low temperature operations this battery has storage life of up to 10 years
Target text information: Five Stars No review.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 32,903
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Fujifilm FinePix XP60 16 MP Digital Camera / MUST READ ! ! After doing plenty of research on underwater cameras at this price level. I came to the conclusion that this is the best camera for the price. PEOPLE,..its an underwater camera,..not a $400 SLR professional camera. ITS best pics are outside and underwater. Expect good pictures at night with the flash at about 10ft of distance,..nothing more. But if I wanted this,..I would not have been using an underwater camera..... HELLO ??? My galaxy S3 phone takes great HD pics and video so I am comparing this review using my phone and the camera. I have an underwater case for my phone and the pics and video are truly HD and awesome. So this little camera had its work cut out for it since I bought it. I thought there would be now way that it could come close to my phone pics and video. I was wrong ! PICTURES: Great high resolution pics even with an 8GB class 4 SDHC card, above and under the water. Love the fact you can take video and shoot pics at the same time. Screen brightness blows my phone away. I can barely see my phone under direct sunlight, but this camera has great brightness and can easily be seen under direct sunlight. Love the burst shot mode ! ! VIDEOS...........VERY IMPORTANT......YOU NEED A CLASS 10 SD CARD TO RECORD HD 1080I VIDEOS. I bought my camera as a bundle at COSTCO which brought me the 8GB SDHC card CLASS 4. DO NOT USE THIS CARD FOR YOUR VIDEOS. A CLASS 4 CARD DOES NOT SUPPORT 1080I VIDEO WELL. IT WILL RECORD IT BUT THE QUALITY WILL REALLY LACK. TRUST ME. I have tried it with both the class 4 and the class 10 cards. Also,..I did research on these cards. The class 10 records perfect 1080i video like my galaxy S3. Some people don't know this and notice that their videos are not great. Its not the camera,..its the card ! So many features that I have yet to learn on this camera. This camera does some things that my Nikon L820 doesn't do. The floating strap is a must if your planning to take it in the ocean. It holds the camera and does not let it sink. Over all. I definitely recommend this camera. I do strongly suggest you buy an external battery charger on ebay or amazon so that you can charge your battery outside the camera. While charging the battery you have to use the provided USB charge cable which means you have to open the battery door and leave it dangling while the battery charges in the camera. This leaves the battery door at somewhat of a dangerous open position and subject to breaking. Overall, this camera does what its supposed to do. Period !
Target text information: wonderful great service and product
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 25,180
|
test
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: The Stabilizer system seems quite durable. The light and especially the microphone are cheaply made. The light is very powerful though for such a small battery. The microphone is almost complete poop. First, the AAA battery doesn't want to go into it. Second, the mounting bar does not want to screw very well. And lastly, the rubber attachment from the mount to the microphone is (unintentionally) bendable, meaning the mic cannot be positioned well. Overall, this product is great... just don't expect a quality mic.
1-hop neighbor's text information: reviee It was ok. The pieces didn't all fit exactly like I would have liked them to. I was expecting something better.
Target text information: Excellent little setup especially for the money Excellent little setup especially for the money. The light is a little bright but with a sleeve filter it is perfect.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 35,830
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Five Stars It's a fantastic lens. Worth every penny. My go to lense
1-hop neighbor's text information: Upgrading your lens for Rebel XTi? 17-85 USM IS vs 28-135 USM IS vs 17-55 2.8f USM IS vs 24-105 4.0f USM IS Folks, I know you want it short. But I am covering quite a bit of information and condensed it so that you can get good information and are able to digest it in less than 5 min. It is quite surprising how many people are being "tortured" with the question on which lens is the right lens when it comes to finding the perfect lens to upgrade the Canon XTi Rebel kit lens (18-55) or even for the Canon 40D (which is often sold with the 28-135 USM IS lens). I read about 500+ reviews and many of them I found very interesting but really did not answer my question on what a good lens is for the Rebel XTi... and with good reasons because YOU have to know what you want or need and then make a call. Here were the criteria I used and I hope you can leverage from these: 1. I wanted a lens which has a great picture quality to have a true upgrade feeling from the Canon 18-55 kit lens (during day light that lens is actually very good and with its light weight is a great carry around lens - however in low light or for really nice portrait shots this lens has limitations not to mention its built quality) 2. I wanted a versatile "Walk Around" lens with good zoom range to cover most of the picture I take (landscape and portraits) in addition to my telephoto lens (70-300mm) 3. If possible a low weight lens - however image quality was a higher priority for me 4. I wanted a Canon lens (though there are very good alternatives from Tamron and Sigma - however they have some disadvantages but given the lower price worth considering) 5. I wanted an Image Stabilizer (IS) and a low noise focus motor, i.e. Canon's USM Many people are looking for a great "Walk Around" lens to avoid changing lenses all the time yet at the same time want great picture qualities. So, your criteria may be different and therefore your choice certainly a good one may differ from mine. As one disclaimer upfront - I am not going into the professional details, i.e. vignetting differeneces at different aperture values or zoom ranges - to make it simple for many readers in this field who just want to make a good decision to buy a great lens without going through the trouble of returning lenses. You will find many reviews on the cropped camera lenses (EF-S) and still people often don't get it right. So, if you have a cropped camera like the Canon Rebel XTi or Canon 40D then the cropped factor is 1.6. In other words no matter what lens you put on these cameras you will get the following zoom ranges which are different from the product names for the lenses: Canon Lens Min Zoom Max Zoom 17-85: 27.2 - 136 28-135: 44.8 - 216 17-55 f2.8: 27.2 - 88 24-105 f4.0 L: 38.4 - 168 Source: Canon's website I went through the extra burden of testing all the lenses myself and not just rely on reviews. So, I went ahead and rented them for 1-2 days and then made up my own verdict so to speak. I also took pictures in similar conditions, looked at them on the computer and printed them out to compare the lenses: 1) The first upgrade lens from Canon which comes to mind is the EF-S 17-85 USM IS f3.5-5.6 lens. This lens would have been a great kit lens but did not meet my requirements for an upgrade lens. It has a very good zoom range and it is still light weight. But the image quality is not as sharp as I would like it to be. And if you commit to spend more money (like $500 for this lens) then you don't want to waste it by just getting a bit more zoom range and an Image Stabilizer. 2) The first lens I actually tried was the EF 24-105 f4.0 USM IS L (luxurious) lens from Canon and I was really happy about the image quality. I was very close to buy this lens but wanted to check out other lenses first. Following drawbacks for me: it is not a wide-angle lens which is useful for landscape shots or even travels shots when you can't afford walking back 5-10 feet. Plus a wide angel lens can give you a nice effect on the picture itself. Another drawback is the aperture value of f4.0 in low light. An aperture factor of f2.8 is faster in low light (the lower the value the larger the aperture - think the Iris of your eye is getting larger and therefore you can see better in low light) and with a running kid or pet at home that is a true advantage. However, with the Image Stabilizer this would not be a big issue. (For more advanced people you can stop down one step to get enough light into the lens in low light conditions but if the object is in motion that may be tricky.) A big plus however is the option to use this lens for any non-cropped canon camera. However, I am ok with using the Rebel XTi and if I want to upgrade to another body later then the 40D would be a great way to go. So, I don't mind to buy EF-S lenses. The EF-S lenses have the advantage that they are generally lighter weight than the full frame lenses. 3) The EF 28-135 USM IS f3.5-5.6 lens has a great zoom range (44-216) but does not have a wide angle (basically anything less than 35mm). However, if zoom range is your top criteria then I'd get the 24-105 L lens without a doubt over this 28-135 lens. For example when you are in full zoom and you are not in bright daylight your pictures will not be as sharp. I tried this lens and the image quality is simply not as good as the 24-105 L lens or the 17-55 f2.8 lens. The 24-105 is also more solidly built. It is a lot of metal built with this lens and it is sealed against dust and water. However, if budget is a constrain to you then the Canon 28-135 lens is a better option for you and according to many folks out there considered to be a better choice than even the EF-S 17-85 USM IS lens. 4) The EF-S 17-55 f2.8 USM IS lens was the last lens I tested and chose over the other three lenses. First, my expectations toward a great image quality (like the 24-105 L lens) were fully met. This lens is using similar components like the L lenses (but it is not fully sealed like the 24-105 L lens is) and shoots extremely well in low light conditions. Plus for a f2.8 (main advantage is large aperture which is very useful for taking great shots in dim lights and faster than f4.0 lenses). Also this lens has less weight (640g) in comparison to the Canon 24-70 EF L f2.8 lens (950g). So, you get a great lens with an acceptable weight. Even the zoom range is fully acceptable to me on my Rebel XTi which comes to 27-88mm. I can take very good portraits shots (without hitting someone's nose with the lens if you will) and it has very nice blur as well (meaning a sharp face in the front and with a blurry background). The only drawback is a flare on some pictures at the bottom of the image when you take pictures using its built-in flash due to the larger lens diameter. However you can either put a better (external) flash light or use Photoshop to correct this issue. I am not a professional photographer and for me this is ok. If you are a professional photographer then you are most likely not as interested in this article anyways. +++Summary+++ The bottom line is that for a true upgrade lens to your kit lens for the Rebel XTi I would recommend the EF-S 17-55 f2.8 IS USM lens. It is worth the investment. This type of lens along with any other L lenses from Canon will always keep its value and you can certainly sell this lens a lot easier if that is the final information you were looking for... ;) I hope this article helps you in directing your decision on which lens to buy. If you are still not sure about what to do then I can only recommend testing the lenses of your choice in a store or ideally rent them or ask your buddies to lend you a lens for a few days. Good luck and enjoy taking great pictures to treasure your memories! Uwe
Target text information: I am thinking about it but the price is to good to be true with a 64GB CF card Has anyone purchased this bundle? I am thinking about it but the price is to good to be true with a 64GB CF card.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 35,004
|
test
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Good value and well made The Pentax-made original of this adapter is now hard to get, and often a lot more expensive if you are lucky enough to find one. The Fotodiox alternative is still available new, and has performed well on my 645D with a range of heavy 1970s manual Takumars. Even with a 300mm Takumar that weighs almost as much as an artillery shell, the adapter formed a secure connection to the camera body with no noticeable rotational play. It felt like the adapter and lens were one unit, which is how it should be on a premium camera. The adapter also has the inner and outer flanges to accommodate both types of Pentax 67 lenses. There are two inner coupling levers to allow auto-diaphragm and meter coupling to the camera. Fotodiox also say that even with the adapter, focussing at infinity is guaranteed. I have verified this in use. The unit does not allow auto-focus and many of the other modern functions found on the 645D, but it will allow Manual Mode and Aperture Priority. The release button to free the lens from the adapter operates smoothly and has been machined accurately to prevent any wobble or rattle. Finish on the adaptor is smooth with a slight sheen to it - a bit like exterior of the old 67 extension tubes. Some 645 users have raised concerns about this as it provides what is potentially a slightly reflective inner surface by the rear element of the lens. By contrast, the 67 extension tubes were flat black on the inside. The solution tried by some is simply to use a touch of flat black paint on the inner surfaces. I have not done this so far, and on the occasions I have used the adapter, the performance of the lenses has not been affected in any way that I have noticed. If it is a problem, it is simple to remedy very cheaply. Anyone wishing to look at the adapter specs on the Fotodiox website will have a game on their hands at present (Aug 2013). When I clicked on "Adapters" and "Medium Format", the website gave me the choice of Hasselblad, Mamiya, and Pentax. Naively I clicked on "Pentax" only to be shown a Vizelex RhinoCam for Sony NEX E-Mount Cameras. Anyone with a penchant for mysteries will enjoy seeing this irrelevant product, but I don't, and I didn't. Finding the details of the 67 to 645 adapter took a lot more mouse work. Overall this adapter is very good value for money, and looks and feels as if it has been built up to a price, rather than down to one. The only slight niggle I have experienced with it in use (only just preventing a five-star rating) is that something can, on occasion, catch when removing the adapter from the camera body. This can result in a slight metallic "ping" that I am not comfortable with. That said, it has performed flawlessly with some very heavy 67 lenses, and is a good alternative for anyone who does not want to trawl eBay for the much more expensive Pentax adapter.
Target text information: Fits tight. Built well. No problems. Fantastic little (big, necessarily) adapter. The result I get on PK film bodies and my Pentax DSLR are quite stunning. Handling them is of course more of chore, but that's expected. You're utilizing such a small portion of focused image in comparison to the 6x7 frame it's meant to fill, all the lenses shine, and show you how much good glass is in there. I use this regularly on a K-3 and MX with my 67 165/2.8 most often. Other work just as well. Just understand you can only use stop-down metering in full manual mode on the 6x7 lenses. Some obvious trade-offs, but the image quality (when you want it) is worth it, especially if you've already got a compliment of 6x7 glass.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 43,871
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great Battery; worth the price. Sony is again the company to look for with great products. I have experience with the Sony DSLR camers and the previous battery, (FM55), which was a great battery to use. I was loving the length of time I got from the battery but this one goes even stronger. This newer battery blows the lid off the amount of pictures. Once I could get around 900 shots now I can get about 1500 shots depending on flash usage and setup. If you need a battery with the stamina to keep pace with your picture taking this is it. It's even backwards compatible with the older Alpha 100 but the 100 battery will not work in the Alpha 700.
Target text information: Good replacement battery Good replacement battery. I've added it to the original SONY batteries form my camera. Holds charge well and lasts through quite a multitude of shots. Will be ordering one or two more as extra backup to the ones I have now.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 40,414
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great buy for the price Great buy for a 7-day cruise without needing to worry. So easy to use that my 4 year-old loved taking pictures of everything. Best part was knowing that on a snorkle stop in Cozumel, the guide was using the exact same camera to sell pictures from the trip. If you're debating on buying a higher end version or trying to be cost-conscious this is a great investment to have.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Good picture quality, a real go-anywhere camera In Hawaii, go-anywhere includes underwater. This is my second Pentax Optio WP-series waterproof camera, I liked the original WP (only 5 mega pixel) so I did not hesitate to buy this WG-2 when I wanted to upgrade. I like it overall, but it is not everything I hoped it could be. I've had it for a few months, but I waited until I used it while snorkeling to finalize the review. Let's face it, you buy this camera for underwater use. It could be better in the following areas: (1) Shutter release button is kind of recessed (may be just flush) and kind of hard to press. I can understand the on-off switch being recessed, but why the shutter release button??? If you take a picture accidentally, what's the big deal? Just erase it! Make the shutter release button easier to press. (2) Other buttons are small-ish. Some buttons are for fingernail operation. Definitely not operable with gloved hand (diving glove). (3) No zooming capability in video mode while shooting. Why? I want to zoom in and out while shooting. (4) The battery-memory-card compartment door is tricky to close. It's the same (as original WP) two-hand operation to open and close, which is good because you don't want it to open accidentally. But closing requires fine alignment of the door to the body, and I worry this mechanism will wear prematurely. It has not leaked, yet, but I worry about this door mechanism developping a leak. (5) Auto exposure in video mode is not continuously adjusting, once the shutter release is pressed the exposure setting seems to be locked in that initial setting. It is OK for most video situation, but if you start the video footage underwater, and continue shooting while surfacing and above water, the exposure becomes all wrong. (6) The interval photo and video modes are nice, but the available intervals are almost useless. The minimum still photo interval is 10 sec. The minimum video interval is 1 minute!!! The only application that I can think of for such a LOOONG interval is maybe for shooting the entire lunar eclipse sequence. Why such a long interval? I need like 0.1 sec, 0.2 sec, 0.5 sec, 1 sec, 2 sec. (7) It is a point-and-shoot camera, so manual controls are difficult or absent. You just need to be aware of that, if you are an advanced photographer. (8) The included strap and carabiner look cool, but useless for underwater use - you need a REAL wrist strap for underwater use. Above negative comments sound harsh, but I'm nitpicking. Overall, it is a nice go-anywhere camera. LIKES: (1) Picture quality is good both under and above water. (2) Excellent macro capability. (3) Nice textured body surface. (4) Includes a real printed operation manual, not just a PDF file of it.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Put this one at the top of your short list <div id="video-block-R2HCK1N56I0Q6I" class="a-section a-spacing-small a-spacing-top-mini video-block"></div><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/D1Yk-dI0meS.mp4" class="video-url"><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/11htNCs0Z0S.png" class="video-slate-img-url">As a professional photographer I have had quite a bit of experience in using my camera gear under unfavorable conditions, including underwater. However when I am taking family snapshots my first choice of camera when I am heading out the door for a fun time with the family and friends is ... well, my cell phone - because it's always with me and it takes good pictures. That puts me squarely in category of being the average person, but with the difference that I know a bit more about cameras and how to capture a good photo than average. And what would be my SECOND choice of the ideal camera to take along for a fun outing? A ruggedized, weather-resistant, easy-to-use snapshot camera that doesn't get in the way of having fun while capture great photo memories. And that is the kind of camera I recommend to you if you are looking for an everyday point-and-shoot digital camera. Of all the brands and models available, Panasonic Lumix has carved the strongest niche into the ruggedized/weatherized camera market and this is one of their best all-around offerings to date. Here's why you should consider it, along with an explanation of what it lacks and why. The DMC-TS30A is a brand-new model as of April 2015 and has a 16MP sensor, more than adequate to capture excellent photos. Thankfully the hype about more megapixels has long passed and most people realize that a good lens and a capable internal processor are at least as important (if not more) than how many megapixels the camera has. And Panasonic Lumix has the track record for producing high quality lens and processors, especially at this, the lower price range of cameras. The lens is a 25-100mm (equiv), the most ideal range I could recommend for everyday picture taking. And it's fast for an entry-level point-and-shoot at f/3.9 meaning better low-light photos and less blur. The other specs like shutter speed and ISO rating are not stellar but they are well suited for a camera of this type and how it will be used. Why is this camera the one you want to take along even if you have a decent camera in your cell phone? The manufacturer's advertising claims that is that it is submersible to 26ft, shockproof to 5ft, freeze-proof to 14 degrees F and also dustproof. Which means you won't have to baby it, just take it where you go and snap away. And the fact that it only weighs about 5 oz (slightly more than an iphone 6) and is MUCH smaller than the iPhone guarantees that it will not be a hassle to carry with you all day. If you are into taking photos underwater (like shallow water snorkeling, not deep diving, this is NOT a dive camera) Panasonic has all the right answers for you including an underwater illuminator to help the colors "snap", and special circuitry to optimize underwater colors. By the way, that torch (as Panasonic calls it) is totally independent of the camera operation, very handy if you are trying to take a photo of someone or something in total darkness, you can turn it on to visually locate your subject for framing. The feature list is impressive for its price: 1280 x 720 pixel HD video (that looks awesome), built-in time-lapse, 12 creative modes and 13 scene modes and a burst mode of 8 frames/second at reduced resolution. What is lacks is Wi-FI (which greatly reduces battery life - I never use it), NFC (nice on a cell phone, useless on a camera), and GPS (a nice feature to have but it also eats up your batteries much faster). One final note is that this camera has enough built-in memory to take about 30 or so pictures without a memory card. You may never use it but it's a great "just in case" backup for that once-in-a-lifetime shot. CONS: For what it's designed for this camera doesn't really have any significant downsides. I've taken some nice sharp clear photos with it and in the fully-automatic mode it is really difficult to take a "bad" picture. The only reality check is that the rear LCD's resolution is only average, certainly not bad and definitely comparable to other cameras in the price range, but once you have used a camera with a higher resolution screen (or most new smartphones) you won't get excited about how ordinary the viewing screen is on this camera. Not really a con but a reality check is that the pictures this camera is capable of are sharp and the color reproduction is very accurate. The camera is capable of taking good pictures under good conditions. But it does have its limits. BOTTOM LINE: Considering photo quality, features, extreme compact size, excellent shockproof and weather-resistant qualities AND a price that won't break your budget I would put this camera at the top of your short list of everyday fun cameras that you will want to take with you everywhere you go. I want to make it clear that a 5-star rating is because it rates well in its price range compared to competitive models. But don't expect DSLR quality and features out of a little point-and-shoot pocket camera, nor should you expect it to substitute for a true dive camera. You get what you pay for with any camera. Check out the attached video for unboxing photos and a real-life glimpse at the first photos and videos I took with this camera. I've used it under a variety of conditions including some underwater video since I made the video and I will add those soon plus some photos/video I've shot in less-than-ideal conditions.
Target text information: Optio Wg-3 - so glad we bought it <div id="video-block-R14HJQT4EX1A2U" class="a-section a-spacing-small a-spacing-top-mini video-block"></div><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/A1M1k9NA8dS.mp4" class="video-url"><input type="hidden" name="" value="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/81NgFaW6-SS.png" class="video-slate-img-url"> As a point of reference, i am not a professional or well-educated photographer -- i'm more of a PHD (point-here-dummy) photographer and take most of my pix on vacation or at big family events, but i do see the difference between good and "ok" photos/video. also, i really value quality photos and easy-to-use video -- if it's easy, you'll use it. if it's high quality, you'll love using it. After investing several hours reviewing all the underwater camera reviews for 2013, i chose this one without the GPS. what an amazing camera. we took it on a caribb. cruise where we took photos and videos while snorkeling, while in tropical waterfalls, and while doing "normal" non-water oriented activities. the attached video is taken from the surface on an overcast day. i've also downloaded a few photos. i think i'm limited to one video, so i've included only underwater. the dry-land video quality is excellent for viewing on my computer, but i haven't yet tried it on the 55" HDTV. i spent the 2 hour flight reading the paper handbook and testing and learning the camera. it was a worthwhile investment of time, as i learned all of the camera's tricks and abilities. it has a lot of nice little features you wouldn't expect and are not mentioned in other reviews/descriptions. i recommend this to everyone. the good/great: photo quality, above and below water video quality and sound, above and below water - amazing, really. ease of use durability - no concerns about my teens dropping it size -- it's a little bigger than non-durable digital cameras, but well worth it. my 14 yr old son likes cameras that he can fit in his pocket. at first he was a little disappointed with the size, because it doesn't really fit in his shorts pocket, but after using the camera, it's now his favorite. 3" screen - works great, even in direct sun and under water. we have another digital cameras with 2" screens, and the 3" is much better. buttons -- very easy to use underwater. your fingers don't slip and you can easily do whatever you need. the editing options -- while the pix are still on the camera, you can crop and do other editing and save the edited pix as a new image. you can also get 3 stills from any video you take. the bad: nothing, really, but if i was being really picky ........ => the battery didn't last as long as i would like -- will not last a whole day of heavy "we are on vacation use". so, i strongly recommend a back-up battery whereever you go. per another Amazon review, i bought the Wasabi dual battery package with charger and did not notice any difference between the Wasabi and Pentax batteries. SEE MORE BELOW - IMPORTANT. => the biner clip and strap-- i always use a wrist strap, so i don't worry when leaning over a cliff or balcony that i'll drop the camera by accident. i had to poach a wrist strap from another camera because the WG-3's carribiner and strap don't give any protection from dropping the camera. they are cute, but not so functional. i'll probably convert them to a keychain. even though the camera is extremely durable, it's too clunky and heavy to hang from my belt-loop and feel safe. => size - see above. a little bigger than ideal, but this is the cost of true, 45-foot underwater abilities. => you should have at least one finger-nail. some of the buttons on the round "ok" button area are a bit close together and i find the one at "9 o'clock" difficult to hit just right. i don't have large fingers, but i found no problem when using my fingernail on that one particular button. if i had no fingernails, i would probably repeatedly hit the wrong button by accident. this button isn't important for taking pictures or video, but is for reviewing and editing. although the camera is waterproof, it is not sink-proof. we got the Chums wrist strap. it works just fine to keep the camera afloat in our test and has a very functional clip so you can easily remove and replace the big floatation device. here's the link: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003CK10DG/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i02?ie=UTF8&psc=1 OVERALL IMPRESSIONS: an excellent camera. when i showed the grandparents the snorkeling shots and video from the PC, they couldn't believe we got such amazing shots from such a small and seemingly-normal camera. And only $300! a word on sellers -- at first, and a week before the trip, i bought an orange WG-3 from a seller on Amazon (we figured orange would be easier to find/recognize than black). they said they would deliver within 2-3 days, so we would get the camera in time for our trip. 5 days later, they still hadn't even shipped it. so, i cancelled that camera and bought a black WG-3 direct from Amazon for an add'l $12 and i splurged on the $3.99 for the guaranteed next-day delivery (we are Prime members). it arrived the following day, giving me time to charge the batteries, make sure it worked, etc. Moral of this anecdote: buy from Amazon. a word on the battery and for when you first get the camera -- the battery arrived 100% dead. i put the battery in and tried using the camera immediately. it didn't work. the camera has a charging cable that attaches to the battery box in the camera, so you can charge the battery without a separate charging device. when you do this, a green light illuminates on the "on/off" button. when i first opened the camera, i tried using the cable to charge the battery via the camera. it didn't work either and the green light didn't illuminate. i thought the camera was a dud. then i used the charging device that came with the Wasabi batteries -- it plugs into a regular wall outlet. that worked. ever since, i've been able to use the charging cable and the green light illuminates, but at first it didn't. don't know what i would have done if i hadn't also bought a wall charger for the batteris. a word on accessories -- i recommend the following: a wall charger for the battery; an extra battery; a high quality SD card (do some research - following the lead of another reviewer, i like the Patriot 32G - worked great for pix and video); a floatation wrist strap that is strong enough for the weight of this slightly larger camera; screen protectors; a bag (again, check the size; we used a neoprene case that can get wet, so we wore the camera on our hip/neck while we trecked up waterfalls and had no worries); a regular wrist strap, as the floating ones are big and unnecessary on land. good luck!
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
8
|
Digital Cameras
|
photo
| 12,512
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Excellent Design - (Except for tabs) I did purchase this item for my point-and-shoot camera (2.5" LCD) and it works very well in blocking the sun/glare from the screen. My only problem, and it's a big one, is that in removing the shade itself, when you don't need it is a nice little TAB arrangement (4 TABS, 2/top and 2/bottom) made of plastic. These little tabs actually broke off within 2 weeks of purchase. Not very reliable. These should be made of a stronger material so they don't break with normal use.
1-hop neighbor's text information: So, so Arrived with broken mini-tripod and LCD Hood Sun Shade and Hard Screen Protector for Nikon Coolpix camera attached with a type of sticky tape. Screen only attached/stayed oc camera for about two days and wouldn't restick. Had to superglue the screen to camera. The screen does what it's supposed to do, block sunlight from hitting the screen, but because it is superglued to the camera not sure what I'll do if it ever breaks. THE real problem, however, is with Nikon not the hard screen protector company. Use of the camera without such a screen is very often near impossible and such a hard screen protector should be a standard, permanent part of the Nikon camera NOT an add-on.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Neat device - but not perfect I bought one of these for a Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3. It attaches to the screen with adhesive and, provided the screen is clean to start with, seems quite positive. The screen is fully visible when it is applied correctly but one has to be careful with positioning it initially, since removing it and applying it a second time seriously weakens the adhesive. The actual shade clicks off and I have found that it will do so in my pocket from time to time, so it is not a very positive fixing. It adds about 5mm to the depth of the camera. I have found it to be less useful as a shade than I expected. Viewing of the screen is still difficult if (a) the sun is directly behind one or (b) if the sun is lighting one's face. This is a problem, however, with all cameras which have no optical viewfinder and is not really related to the use of a shade.
Target text information: some shading, good screen protection, your choice Delkin eFilm Universal Pop-Up Shade 2.5" Not having seen ANY in-depth reviews on this product family, I am submitting one here. Bottom line: * I did not see that the pop-up shade helped at all in the very bright area where I live, but may work for you. * the LCD protector included is well-designed and will not leave any adhesive on the LCD when you take it off (see below)--but it's not non-glare & reflection isn't reduced much by the shade. * thickness and detailed installation instructions/tips are not provided. So if you can't see this shade in person before buying, I have included install/tip information here. I used the version to attach the pop-up shade to the 2 1/2" LCD on my new Canon A700 camera. Briefly, there is a LCD protector that fits over the LCD and a pop-up shade that snaps on and off to the side--then up. * Contrary to my hopes, the pop-up shade did not reduce any light on the LCD on a very bright sunny day. Also, since the plastic on the LCD protector is not non-glare (presumably to insure more light transmission), no glare is reduced when there is a lot of sun, even with the shade up. * The plastic LCD protector is very good because it provides protection for the side where it attaches to the LCD AND to reduce scratching on the side where you look at the LCD. On the side where it attaches to the LCD, there is a 1/8" to 1/4" wide slightly raised adhesive area that attaches around my 2 1/2" LCD area. Thus the adhesive does not go on the viewable part of the LCD itself and the raised edge presumably keeps the plastic from touching the LCD very much. Since I had to reposition the protector once, I vouch that the adhesive does not leave a mark (but, as instructions state, if you have to reposition it may not stick again). On the side where you look through it at the LCD, there is also a duplicate slightly-raised border (about 1/8" wide on top and bottom and about 1/4" wide on the sides) that should protect a good part of this outside of this recessed LCD protector from possible abrasion in a case, pocket, etc. * I was most concerned about the thickness of the entire unit, since my camera is already so thick it barely fits in my pocket. The combined LCD protector and shade is about 5/16" thick (too thick for me plus left me worrying that a sudden move might break off the shade from the LCD protector). But the LCD protector itself is only about 3/32" thick. Since the shade can be snapped on and off, I can carry it separately. Installation tips: 1) I found that turning on the LCD made it easier to position the protector to center it. 2) Although the attachment of the shade to the protector (that snaps on and off to the side--then up) works OK, you have to be GENTLE. If you're careful, snapping and unsnapping the shade should work fine. 3) It seemed easier to me to unsnap the shade and just attach the LCD protector by looking through it to center the sticky border around the LCD. At first I thought the shade attached only to one long side of the protector (so be sure the right side's up), but after attachment it appears to attach to either long side. 4) When I got ready to unpeel the cover for the adhesive on the sticky side of the protector where you attach it, I saw a white peel-off border and the note REMOVE PROTECTIVE FILM over the clear plastic. I assumed that if I peeled off the white border, it included the protective film. BAD ASSUMPTION. I suggest you remove the protective film over the plastic first (the only way I found was to carefully put your fingernail under it--carefully because the film is recessed below the white peel-off border). By removing film first you will not be trying to remove it while balancing fingers around a 1/8" to 1/4" wide sticky border. I did not really research alternatives, but a good non-glare film (like used on a PDA--that peels off with no adhesive) that transmits light well looks like it is a better answer for me.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 1,566
|
test
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Purchase with caution... This seemed like a handy and useful item. When it arrived, I was pleased with the appearence and feel. Then came the downfall...the item did NOT function with the battery magazine that was used to hold the Canon LP-E8 batteries. There are 2 positions, for 2 batteries. Supposedly, you can use one or two batteries. Neither position would work. At this point, I thought the grip was defective. Then I loaded the 6 AA batteries in their separate magazine and loaded into the grip. Now everything worked perfectly. The problem was with the magazine used for the LP-E8 batteries. I contacted Amazon, they instructed me on how to contact the seller, bestdealusa, which I do not believe is even in the U.S. Also, they have NO PHONE NUMBER. I contacted them, they asked for the order number which I provided, THEN THEY DID NOTHING...except passed the problem back to Amazon. They will not take any responsibility for the product. After troubleshooting...the problem turned out to be the contacts did not make contact with the rechargable batteries. Using a small needlenose pliers, I was able to CAREFULLY, and I re-emphasize CAREFULLY, move the contacts out enough to make contact with the batteries. The unit then functioned as it was supposed to....but with NO help from the seller at all. I am an electronics technician by trade. IF you have this product...IF you are experiencing the same problem, it may be able to easily repair it. If you are uncertain of doing it yourself, seek assistance. IT IS ONLY plastic and can easily be broken. I hope this might help.
1-hop neighbor's text information: I could not differentiate this from the stock Canon battery ... I could not differentiate this from the stock Canon battery grip. Mine works flawlessly and exactly as expected. I use it for having longer battery life while filming and making time lapses. The integrated shutter button and exposure knob are helpful for portrait photography as well.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Can't tell it's not OEM I was completely worried when I ordered this grip. I had a Canon Rebel before with the true Canon battery grip and had heard horror stories of knock off battery grips... so I was hesitant to buy this but decided to give it a shot for the price difference. I am completely impressed with this product. Not only is the grip built very well, but they include two batteries and a tray that allows you to use regular batteries should you need to in a pinch. Great product. I'm glad I ordered this and saved a boat load of money.
Target text information: A++++ Works Great on my Canon T3i Just got this grip today and wow am I amazed. I'm really glad I bought this grip. Everything works just great. All the buttons work and function with my Canon T3i and this grip really adds a nice look and touch to my camera... The 4 batteries that came with this is definitely a plus! I couldn't be more pleased at the quality of this item and am glad i finally made the purchase! I highly recommend this grip to anyone that is looking at getting one and is on a budget. Don't spend the $150+ dollars for Canon grip, its not worth it.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 7,801
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Works and holds the charge Works and holds the charge for now. Used on a Panasonic PVGS-320 miniDv camcorder.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great Value! Great having two (2) high capacity batteries which the camera (Panasonic HC-V700Mk) recognizes correctly. I can completely fill a 64GB SD card with about 6 hours of HD video and still have battery remaining. Also great having a plug in charger (for home & car!) so I don't have to recharge batteries in the camera. Very happy with product - better than described and delivered lightning fast. Did I mention this was a great value??
1-hop neighbor's text information: Works great. Good price from Amazon After returning a couple of Batteries that I had bought from ebay, because they were not truly compatible with CGR-DUO6, I bought this one from Amazon. This is true replacement for CGR-DUO6 original Panasonic Battery and works for my GS-3200 Panasonic camcorder. It lasts significantly longer than the original Panasonic Battery.
Target text information: EXCELLENT PRODUCT EXCELLENT PRODUCT MEETS EXPECTATIONS WAITING, HAS A HIGHER POWER CHARGING THE BATTERY THAT HAD THE ORIGINAL, MY CONGRATULATIONS TO THE DEALER BECAUSE THE PRODUCT IS EXCELLENT.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 11,799
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Compares favorably to Vortex DiamondBack!!! UPDATED 6-23-2016 UPDATED 6-23-2016 The image on this monocular is DEFINITELY better than from a Vortex DiamondBack 10x42 binoculars (purchased in 2014). This monocular is also definitely Brighter in it's light gathering, enough to be slightly noticeable. I've done extensive back-and-forth between this monocular, the DiamondBack 10x42's and the DiamondBack 8x28's. I purchased this monocular after having been very unhappy with my purchase of the Vortex Solo 10x36 Monocular. The Vortex monocular was pretty much impossible to focus with the same hand that was holding the unit. The Vortex monocular's focus ring was ridiculously stiff! The focus adjuster on this Bushnell monocular can be adjusted just fine with a single finger from the same hand which is holding the unit. It is not as smooth as the focus adjuster on my Vortex DiamondBack Binoculars... but not too much stiffer than those binoculars. Also.. this unit comes with a flip-down style Objective Lens cap, and the eye-piece has a tethered rubber cap. The Picatinny-rail piece you see in the photographs has 3 slots thru it and the middle slot of those has a standard 1/4-20 threaded tripod mount hole in it. This Bushnell monocular also has a nice strong belt-clip attached to the left-hand side of the unit (if looking thru the unit with the focus adjuster sitting on the top as in the picture here). The attached photos were taken by simply holding up my Nokia Lumia 928 cellphone by-hand up to the lense of this Bushnell Monocular while I had it on the Tripod. The deer in the photos are 100 yards away. I will appreciate the weight savings this device will give me for those times when I wish to pack-in my spotting scope as well.
1-hop neighbor's text information: High quality lense easy to carry Awesome high quality lense, has the eyepiece view of high eye point Nikon camera (like the old F3), perfect with glasses, easy to carry, fits within palm of hand, useful for a quick spoting during outdoor walks or sporting events. Nice and bright in low light situation. Perfect power 5x to size. I don't have to lug around binoculars anymore. Great if you want to travel light, packs in a small case. It's small so it's good to remember to keep it in a zipped up pocket when out and about. I carry it everywhere. The one I got was shipped from Japan, so there was a slight wait, however, delivery was sooner than expected, extremely well packed. Exactly what I was looking for,
1-hop neighbor's text information: Little useful toy PERFECT for EDC: it's small and doesn't weigh anything, neck loop and soft case provided. Very clever design-packing that swell 9x magnifier-just rotate the black ring! Smooth focus with one finger, no need for two hands. Optics not great but alright for the price of course. I am very happy with it but if I lose or break it, I'll save up for a Leica, now that I see how useful these monoculars are. Made in Japan. All plastic (the word "metallic" from description refers to the colour).
Target text information: More useful than you'd think This is the 2nd Nikon monocular I've owned. The first one (which I have had for at least 15 yrs) I left in our second home in FL... it saves me time and money, because I use to to check the temperature displayed on a bank's billboard about 1/2 mile away... no kidding... I take it everywhere I go when I travel, as it is much more compact than a big clunky pair of binoculars. Plus you can flip lens and turn it into a microscope -- or what we +40yr olds need -- emergency reading glasses!
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
2
|
Binoculars & Scopes
|
photo
| 2,530
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Can't beat this price anywhere! This is an amazing deal on this photo package and it literally has everything you need to protect your camera, store as much memory as you will ever need, and two tripods. I checked these prices both retail and online before purchasing and saved over 58%.
Target text information: Happy with all accessory purchases Great deal for the price
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 34,348
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Sony Cybershot S650 - great buy I bought this camera to take with me to Disney World. I have a digital SLR but didn't want to use it on this trip as it is a little heavy for carrying all day - just wanted a small camera which would go in my pocket. I am certainly not disappointed with my purchase - I took over 400 photos and have only deleted 20 of them. The majority of the pictures were sharp with excellent color. I used the optical zoom quite a lot - and this worked really well. I disabled the digital zoom. All the pictures were taken at the highest quality so I could edit later if necessary. I took a lot of night shots of firework displays - some of the pics weren't so great - but others were very good. I would certainly recommend this to anyone wanting a convenient, easy to use camera. The menu is easy to navigate and I found the batteries lasted a long time. It's nice to be able to buy regular AA batteries to use as an emergency. I spent a lot of time in the evenings scrolling through all my pictures, so the batteries were really put to the test! I do like a viewfinder and this camera does not have one - but it really wasn't a problem and even the shots I took when I couldn't really compose the image worked well.
Target text information: Comparison to Canon Powershot S40 1) Size. Both cameras are small but the crown goes to Olympus, even if only by few cubic points. Olympus is also lighter of the two. 2) Resolution. Both cameras feature 4.1Mpixel CCD. What Canon misses and Olympus has is an extrapolation to 3,200 X 2,400 (or 7+Mpixels). By making an extrapolation from a raw image (not even TIFF!) the camera may make a much smarter decision then your average Photoshop program. This is the must if you want to print a poster from your picture. 3) Picture quality. Very good and comparable between both cameras. Even the most advanced reviewers have a hard time giving clear advantage to one or the other. Canon has a slightly better rendering algorithm, so the nod goes to Powershot but not by much. ... 4) Lenses - for all purposes the same. Not as fast as on any of the bigger cameras but satisfying for most applications. 5) Zoom - same. 6) Storage media. Olympus uses SmartMedia, while Canon uses CompactFlash (types I and II). Both supply laughable 16Mb out of the box, so you have to purchase larger modules. The prices for memory are comparable but advantage goes to Canon, since Compact Flash is a more advanced format and comes in bigger sizes. Still, 128Mb is more then enough for a day of shooting. 7) Batteries. Both cameras are not ideal. Canon pretty much forces you to buy additional module ... since it uses a proprietary format, but Olympus does not supply a rechargeable batteries and does not allow to recharge in camera, so you need to buy NiMh AA batteries and charger, which would cost the same (smart investment). Still I would give an advantage to Olympus because you can always find AA batteries in any store if you ran out of power. I also want to address here the power consumption since a lot of users are giving their thumbs down based on this feature alone. Both cameras are bad. This is a sad reality if you want a subcompact camera. But not make a tragedy out of this. If you use both cameras smartly, it should last you the whole day of shooting quite easily. 8) Price. Still too high IMHO for both of cameras. Canon is slightly more expensive but not by much. You can buy any camera now for less [money]. With all accessories (memory, batteries, case, etc.) you should just be able to fit in ... budget. 9) Flash. Mediocre at best for both cameras. Canon does a slightly better job at red-eye reduction, but Olympus is slightly better with white-balance adjustment. Still this is probably the weakest point for both cameras. 10) Video. Both cameras have built-in video mode with sound recording and speaker for later review. Since I don't care much for this feature I won't discuss it here. 11) Supplied software. Olympus ships with camera the Adobe Photoshop Elements - by far the best photo-editing package on the market now. 12) Nice extras. Canon comes in a metal casing which gives it a very sophisticated and ruggish look. Olympus casing is more stylish IMHO and is made of very sturdy plastic. Both cameras have auto USB connectivity and optional waterproof cases. Olympus has three unique features that made me buy it. First is a low-light noise reduction that can be activated when you switch camera into night shot option. The special algorithm that Olympus uses allows it to compensate for long-exposure related errors (such as "hot" pixels) and results in a much better looking pictures. If you like to make night photos (I do) you can't live without this feature. Second feature is pixel mapping that allows camera to compensate for dead pixels in CCD. Until you have this problem you won't probably think much about it. The third feature is "User Mode" which allows you to store your preferable settings and access them by simple switch of the dial. I use it quite often and it saves a lot of preparation time before shot is taken and results in a better quality picture. It is especially useful if you take a series of pictures in challenging lighting conditions (such as twilight time). Overall, I chose Olympus for the above mentioned features, but you can't go wrong with any of these little cameras.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
8
|
Digital Cameras
|
photo
| 476
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: I'm "Disappointed"... I'm "disappointed" that my $4,000 (if you can find one at retail) Leica Summilux 50mm f/1.4 didn't blow this $300 Sony lens out of the water. This will be a limited, non-technical review, as there are plenty of in-depth reviews on-line already, and my quick comparisons were only done at f/2.0. First, I shot both lenses using my tripod mounted Sony Nex-7 APS-C at 1/125 sec, manually focusing on a building and street construction across the street from my loft. The average person would not be able to chose which photo was "best," though the aspherical lens Leica had a very slight edge (sharpness, distortion, color e.g.) over the Sony. I then shot close-ups at ~3 ft, table mounted, 1/30th sec, f/2.0. Bokeh and sharpness on the Leica was only slightly better, unnoticeable to most, and again the Sony performed beautifully in this David versus Goliath comparison. Of course, for my extra $3700 I can open the Leica to f/1.4 and leave the Sony in tears. Or did I just see the egoless but autofocusing and anti-shake Sony wisely smile at my all-manual big-ego Leica?
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great lens but with limitations Although I did not buy this lens from Amazon, I did rely on Amazon reviews of this lens to make my decision. So as a way of saying thank you to Amazon, I am sharing my own review of this lens. Please be aware that this review is oriented mostly towards amateurs like myself because this is essentially an amateur lens. Here is what I liked about this lens: 1. Price: this lens is really cheap for a true macro lens that provides 1:1 magnification. Most likely, this is the cheapest macro lens around. 2. Excellent results: This lens is extremely sharp. Since I have owned mostly amateur grade lenses so far, I was amazed to see the sharpness on this lens. At 100% crop, the pictures taken with lens look tack-sharp. 3. Makes a great general purpose lens too: Many first time buyers of macro lenses often believe that a macro lens is good for only macro work. Contrary to that belief, this lens makes a great general purpose prime lens too. On an APC-C sensor, this lens acts as a 45 mm lens, which is equivalent to a normal lens and is great for casual outdoor shots, portraits and even landscapes. Because of the wide f2.8 aperture, I have been able to capture much better portraits with this lens as compared to the 18-55 kit lens. Here is what I did not like about this lens: 1. Poor low light focusing capability I see this lens struggling to focus in low light conditions a lot more than any other lens I have used. The kit lens beats this lens hands-down in this department. So most of the times, if the light is not sufficient, I just switch to manual focus. 2. Noise: This lens is really noisy when focusing. So if you are meaning to capture that little butterfly with this lens, better switch to manual focus or you'll scare it away with the noise. 3. Working distance too small: Well, let's face it. This lens may be cheap, but the focal length of this lens isn't the most appropriate for macro work. To get full magnification with this lens, you'll need to get within an inch of the subject, which makes this lens unsuitable for photographing live subjects. 4. No focus limiter switch: This lens has no focus limiter switch. Focus limiter switch on a macro lens lets you limit focus search to a part of the focusing range so the lens searches for focus within that range only. Many of the more superior macro lenses (including the Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro) have this switch. The absence of this switch on this lens makes auto-focusing really difficult, as the lens travels from one inch to infinity in search of perfect focus - sometimes without success. Yet another reason I resort to manual focus while using this lens. So is this lens for you? The answer to that depends entirely on what kind of photographer you are and what you expect from this lens. If you are really passionate about macro photography, especially about capturing small insets, you are likely to want to upgrade to a quieter and faster macro lens that lets you stay within a convenient working distance of your subjects. In that case, I'd suggest you to go straight to one of the other lenses such as the <a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Sony-50mm-f-2-8-Macro-Lens-for-Sony-Alpha-Digital-SLR-Camera/dp/B000DZH712/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro Lens for Sony Alpha Digital SLR Camera</a> or the <a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Sigma-50mm-f-2-8-EX-DG-Macro-Lens-for-Canon-SLR-Cameras/dp/B0002P19PS/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Lens for Canon SLR Cameras</a>. If you just want to experiment with macro photography and don't want to spend too much for it, you'd enjoy using this lens.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great, exceeded expatiations Fantastic! I was really surprised at how well this lens performed. This is now my go to lens. It has replaced my Zeiss 1.8/24 as my walk around lens for the Sony 6000.
Target text information: great lens for a neophyte Since I generally use the auto settings on my camera, I really don't know what its capable of, but it certainly takes an extraordinary picture with this lens when the camera is making all the adjustments. This is my first time playing with Macro shots and its produced some great pictures, although nothing jaw dropping...that's probably more my eye for subject matter than the lens though.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
10
|
Lenses
|
photo
| 17,933
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: AMAZING!! I don't understand the negative reviews. I do daily youtube videos and wanted to upgrade to at least some beginner lights. They have improved my videos 1000% I have had zero problems with any part of these lights. I watched a youtube video to figure out how to put them together. I had them up and was filming within less than 20 minutes. Ignore the negatives. These lights are perfect for a beginner.
1-hop neighbor's text information: S120 first thoughts and vs RX100 Just got this camera and have less than 100 pictures through it and although every year I buy one of these and end up returning it, it looks like this "S" might be a keeper finally. Like most of its predecessors it's built very well, feels good in the hand, and most of the buttons have good feedback. It has gotten a little more rounded over the years but I like it, square camera with smooth edges that don't annoy me in the pocket. Out of the pocket this camera is probably adjustability-overkill for most people that haven't dared of taking their camera out of AUTO mode. Whether you like shooting in AUTO or you do choose to leave AUTO behind, the S120 rewards you with a very fast interface, fast response (focus/shutter), and the ability to view and share your images across other devices quickly. I am a Canon guy. That should not be missed here because I am a little biased, but I have an iphone(5) for my day to day camera. My weekend camera is a Canon 6D and a bag of L lenses. I bought the S120 to bridge the gap between the two. I am not a professional, but sometimes I want professional pics without using my phone or lugging a big DSLR kit around with me - enter the S120. With the S120 Canon FINALLY offers a simple camera that seems to do everything I want well. What do I want? - Ability to capture amazing pictures without carrying 20# of lenses with me. - Ability to hand my wife/kids a camera that they can use too. - Fast power up, fast focus, fast capture. - Great video if the situation calls for it, on the fly, no delay. - EASY way to transfer pictures to my phone (for when I do want to send them elsewhere). - Canon menus, because they make sense to me. It does all of these in my opinion, quite well. If you are looking for a camera that outshines just about anything else on the shelf under 700$ and can avoid bulking your pants pocket - this is the one. Whats in the box: - Canon S120 camera. - Canon (NB6-LH) battery. - Canon wall charger (CB-2LY). - Canon wrist cord. - Registration documents. - Warranty info. A couple other things I wanted to mention... WiFi -- It's actually useful now! This model features a new wifi setup for transferring pictures to your smartphone. I have had this on (2) other units (S110 and EOS 6D) and never use it because it's a pain. With this model I just go into "play" mode on the camera, press the wifi button (up on the D pad) , it immediately asks what I want to connect to, I select "smartphone" and it says start the phone application and point it to this hotspot. Once I do that, I am on the phone browsing pictures. Scrolling through images (large JPEG) on the camera is pretty quick, downloading is pretty quick, disconnecting and getting back to shooting is just as quick. Now you can literally turn wifi on, send a specific image over to your phone, turn wifi off, in the matter of a couple seconds and a few button clicks. I won't go into what the old way was, because if I could remember it I would actually use it! RX100 vs S120 -- Just before the S120 was announced I finally broke down and bought an RX100 (new). Not the M2 model but the original, for 600$. I loved the pictures it took, they were amazing amazing images. Compared to the S120 (in circumstances so far) they are possibly a little better comparing auto mode to auto mode. What I like about the Canon vs the Sony is the Canon seems to capture more how I see things as opposed to the Sony which wanted to make everything look like a carnival if left untouched (it liked to make all the colors exotically vibrant from my perspective). If this were just about images there would have been some tough decisions to make and hairs to split over this. The size and weight of RX100 to S120 it's no contest:S120. I can put the S120 in a pair of khaki's and go sit in meetings or walk around all day with no worries. The RX100 just felt too darn heavy, and it's larger lens tube sticking out from the front was annoying getting in and out of pockets. The S120 is still a true pocket-friendly camera is what I am getting at. Build quality-wise both feel like finely crafted machines. The S120 will remind you of other point and shoot cameras and its finish is something I would feel ok with putting in a bag with no case. The RX100 felt like some sort of surgical tool, I mean in a good way - but I felt like putting down on a desk would damage the desk or possibly the finish on the camera. Another strange thing is the S120 feels good in the hand and has some heft but nothing bad. The RX100 felt a little heftier but in a way that I felt if I dropped it, it's life was over - it was just waiting for an opportunity to spill its guts. I would expect the S120 to take a small hit or some tumbling without ending it. Cost - Although money can be irrelevant to most photographic geeks when it comes to "getting the shot" , I didn't understand why the Sony was hundreds more. The "why" of this is in other parts of the review here so I won't get into it more. I will just say I had a $1,000 budget for my perfect point and shoot, and now I have 550$ to go spend on something else. Software - I left this for last because I suspect this is where Canon bias comes in. It is also something I suspect is different in the newer model Rx-100(M2) so may not be as relevant. The S120 UI is quick and also very efficient. The RX-100 by comparison was a little slow, and (at least for me) I never felt like I could quickly get to the settings I wanted to without forcing some customization. Neither is over-glitzy or annoying to use, but the Sony one just felt like it was fighting me sometimes when I would change something and then have to re-find it. I hope you enjoyed this review and I will update it as relevantly as is feasible. If there is more you'd like to see added or something I missed please comment and let me know, and thanks for reading this! -Chris
1-hop neighbor's text information: Extremely overpriced! This is nothing but one single piece of hard plastic. It costs virtually nothing to make, yet it's sold for $11.95. I threw mine out, as they deduct $5.01 for return shipping. If you need a lens cap buy it somewhere else.
Target text information: This camera is amazing for its size. Amazing camera. I'm a professional photographer and I am extremely impressed with the picture quality. I also love all the manual controls and the ease-of-use. I shoot weddings on a Canon 5D Mark III and a Canon 6D. In a pinch I could easily use this camera if I needed to. The picture I have attached is a 15 second exposure with my kids running around with solar lights. This shot is un-edited and was shot in raw. The only thing I did with the picture was transfer it via Wi-Fi to my cell phone using the Canon picture app.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
8
|
Digital Cameras
|
photo
| 28,703
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Excellent lens, and great value in a telephoto zoom. This lens is excellent, and excellent value. It is very sharp and fast. It fills any need I have for a telephoto zoom. It's optics are excellent. It is a constant aperture lens for a great price. The photos I have taken have sort of a "retro" look to them that I love. This is the first AF lens I have used (my other lenses are AF-S). I couldn't be happier, the auto focus is every bit as good as my AF-S lenses. It is slightly slower, but I had no problem focusing perfectly on a 5 year old running directly at me. I heard others have had AF issues with this lens, but my sample does not have these issues. It focuses perfectly. One thing to note -- you need to have a camera that is compatible with the AF system, meaning your camera body must have an AF motor. I believe all full frame Nikons have this, and most higher end DX bodies have this. Check your camera compatibility first before buying, otherwise the lens will only work in manual focus mode. Another note -- to engage the AF, you need to have the aperture ring set all the way to f32, where it locks. This will enable the camera body to have control over the aperture and AF. Without setting this, my camera just gave an AF error, and did not let me release the shutter. It took me a few minutes to figure this out. The lens is built with high quality. It is more compact and lighter than modern telephoto zooms, so it is much easier to pack with you on a photo safari. There are no AF-S motors embedded in the lens that can will go bad in 20 years. The zoom ring is a delight to use -- It is large, easily accessible, and spins freely. The lens does not change focus when zooming. The lens also does not change shape while zooming. When focusing, the outer ring moves in and out by about an inch (1.5 cm). The AF system makes a bit more noise than my AF-S lenses, but nothing bothersome. The size, shape, and function of this lens make it a real pleasure to shoot. It has the feel of a lens that will last the rest of my life. The picture quality is better than I expected. Photos I took were exceedingly sharp with this lens. I didn't test the limits much, but I didn't notice much if any falloff when shot at f4. The images had a sort of "retro" look that I loved. It's hard for me as an amateur to describe. Perhaps they had a bit more contrast than I am used to? Perhaps the colors were a little less saturated? I'm not sure. But the images were quite pleasing to me. One thing to note -- the bokeh was a bit unique. The diaphragm is 7 sided and not rounded, so any out of focus points of light are heptagons (seven sided polygons) instead of circles. Perhaps this contributed to the retro feel of the photos? I don't know. Some might find this distracting. I also noticed some slight chromatic aberration, but nothing too blatant and nothing that cannot be fixed in post processing. Overall this lens far exceeded my expectations. It is good for portraiture, great for outdoor and nature photography, and is fast enough to work indoors in relatively low light. I can't reiterate enough how good the build quality is and how pleasant this lens is to shoot. All of this in a low cost package. If you can find one of these lenses in good shape, don't hesitate. Buy it. You won't be disappointed. This lens is a hidden gem.
Target text information: Sharp lens. This is one of nikon's cheaper made lenses, but the sharpness and overall contast is good for the price it sells for.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
10
|
Lenses
|
photo
| 6,522
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Five Stars good buy
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great Performing HD MiniDV Tape - Recommended Sony MiniDV tape has always worked well in our SD camcorders (Canon and Panasonic) and now that we moved to HD (<a data-hook="product-link-linked" class="a-link-normal" href="/Canon-VIXIA-HV40-HD-HDV-Camcorder-with-10x-Optical-Zoom/dp/B001OI2Z4Q/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_rvw_txt?ie=UTF8">Canon VIXIA HV40 HD HDV Camcorder with 10x Optical Zoom</a>), the Sony "DVC HD MiniDV" tapes are the only ones we plan to use. The playback quality is just amazing and we have never noticed any errors in our recordings. This is very important to us since we film instructional videos for our family business and need to be sure that the video is perfect every time. Highly Recommended!
1-hop neighbor's text information: Let's hope they continue to make these I bought my son (the future Steven Spielberg) a video recorder for Christmas and got these tapes for him too. I just hope that technology doesn't leave all us "poor suckers" in the dust again. Anyone want to buy an 8-track playerr? A TV antenna fot your roof? A PONG video game? A BETA format tape player? But seriosly, the picture and sound quality you get from these is incredible -- and far exceeds the tedchnology we (old people) had. And these were a good price. Not to mention I could avoid shopping during the holiday season.
Target text information: Great Deal for this pack of 2 HD Tapes! Purchased this pack of 2 HD tapes at $5.00 with free prime shipping. I wasn't too sure if I was buying the right kind of tape for our new HD camcorder, however, no worries with Amazon's great return policies. Other tapes I had seen in retail stores were selling anywhere from 2.5-3x the price for packs of 2 HD tapes, hence my initial apprehension at purchasing these tapes, compared to retail prices these were a steal. Notice that on the packaging of the tape, nowhere does it say for HD camcorders, so I had to trust the description which said that this tape was appropriate for HD camcorders. Received the tapes, popped them into our camcorder, set it to HD record and success! They worked! Thanks Amazon. I will be purchasing more at this great price.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 6,308
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: not so pleased - review updated 2-27-14 I have been using a Manfrotto 804RC head with my Manfrotto 190PROB tripod and Panasonic GH2 camera. The 804 head is OK for still images, albeit a bit "sticky" when it comes to adjusting. This stickiness is a major problem when trying to use it for smooth video pans. Smooth vertical tilts are impossible with the 804. In fairness, the 804 is designed as a still image head, so its unfair fault its inability to work well for video. The 502 head was recently released, and I was able to compare it to the 701 head. From what I could tell, the 502 has much smoother panning and tilting, and far better adjustment options. I snapped one up on sale, and have been very pleased with this purchase. A few on-line forum members suggested that my GH2 would be too light for the 502 head, but I don't find that to be the case at all. Plus, I have a small rail rig with a digital recorder, and will soon add a follow focus. The additional weight is easily handled by the 502 head. One issue I have with the 502 is that the long mounting plate is finished with a rough texture that binds a bit when mounting it into the head. I would think the surface would be smooth for easy in and out, but for some reason its not. It takes a little bit of effort to slide the camera and plate into place on the tripod, but its a minor issue that may be lessened as the surface wears down over time. I sort of wish the tilt locking screw (on the right of the head) and the tension adjustment (on the left of the head) were reversed, as it would be more convenient for my set up. Minor issue, really. The locking device for the panning is located inside the head's "bridge" assembly. The location is a bit inconvenient. It will disconnect if you unscrew it, but you only need to give it 1.5 turns to go from locked to unlocked. A simple lever may have been a better option. I purchased the flat base version of this head. There is a ball mount version, which requires a tripod that has the proper ball mount. The ball system allows for faster leveling, but my 190PROB tripod is a flat base model. FWIW, Manfrotto offers their model 438 leveling device, which I intend to purchase. UPDATE - June 20th: After using this video head for a year, I have adapted to the less-than-ideal ergonomics, and I am mostly pleased with its performance. Smooth pans and tilts, and it performs as it did when new. I feel it is a "professional" video head, but I would caution that it may be overkill for shooting stills and a bit heavy for travelling. Since purchasing the 502, I have added the Manfrotto 438 leveling device. It works great, but does add a bit more weight and height. As I use the 438 a lot, I will probably buy a "ball mount" tripod head the next time around. One issue that plagues me is that the adjustment screw for the arm frequently binds within the bracket that holds the arm in place. Its a real pain in the butt to sort out, and always happens at the wrong time during busy shoots. I have to be very mindful when adjusting this, as it will always bind if I am not particularly careful when adjusting it. I fear this will eventually fail and be difficult, if not impossible, to replace or repair. Like the awkward ergonomics, I think this is bad design, especially for an otherwise professional product. Another issue that bugs me is the high price of the 504 PLONG quick release plate. Manfrotto sells other "long" plates for less money, so I'm not sure why this one costs $65. FWIW, the shorter Benro QR6 release plate fits into the 502 video head, and sells for a reasonable $25. For a heavy video camera the Benro QR6 may not offer as much support, but for my Panasonic GH2 with large lenses it works just fine. My original review was 5 stars, but now that the honeymoon is over, I took off one star due to the adjustment screw issue. All in all, I like the 502 video head a lot. In spite of the awkward ergonomics, sticky arm adjustment, weight and pricey quick release plate, it delivers great performance and will hopefully last many years. UPDATE - Feb 20th, 2014: After struggling with the weird ergonomics of this head and the poorly designed pan arm attachment, I can no longer recommend this head. While it performs well when set up, it is slow and cumbersome to operate due to the poorly positioned tilt lock and pan lock knobs. The major flaw is that the pan arm is CONSTANTLY binding up within the fixture that attaches it to the base of the video head. There is a notch in the soft aluminum arm that becomes misaligned with the mounting screw. The arm becomes easily bound up, and requires complete disassembly. I have done this so many times that the arm is all torn up and has to be replaced ($30 is the cheapest price I can find). I had requested customer support from Manfrotto regarding the arm while it was under warranty, but never got a reply. While I generally like Manfrotto products, this one and the non-existent customer service has me looking at other brands.
Target text information: Five Stars Great product
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
6
|
Tripods & Monopods
|
photo
| 47,417
|
test
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: NOT Perfect, But serves its purpose PERFECTLY This review should cover both the Samyang & Rokinon 12mm lenses since they share exactly the same components (just branded differently). This lens is NOT perfect, but it serves its purposes PERFECTLY. What do I mean? This is obviously a landscape & architectural lens and when the lens is set for those purposes, it works very well. But once you start trying to use it for different scenarios its shortcomings become very apparent. CONS: 1) Manual Focus Lens: pretty much means anything fast-moving is none capturable (Not a word, but you probably get what I mean) 2) Since it is COMPLETELY manual, it doesn't even leave aperture metadata (not a huge deal since you should only be shooting at f8 & f11. Photos will detail exactly why) 3) My particular lens was off center and the left side was not as sharp as the right side, but was remedied at smaller apertures 4) I bought this lens for landscapes and astrophotograhy (because its f2.0) but f2.0 the photos are far from sharp which somewhat defeats its purpose for astro. PROS: 1) Exceptionally wide angle view w/o fisheye (I feel fisheye has its place, but not for my purposes) 2) Once the aperture is set appropriately the lens sharpens up A LOT! (see the pics to see what I mean) 3) Affordable (subjective) 4) It is compact and relatively light and matches my a6000 very well, dare I say, even jacket pocketable, but not pants pocketable. FINAL VERDICT: If you want to shoot landscapes, this lens will serve you VERY well at F8.0 & F11. Other apertures are pretty poor. It has a short minimum distance which is good to get a somewhat macro-ish image I don't think there is a better deal out there for landscape photogs at the moment and if that is your preference, but it now (mine 3 1 9 u s d)! Do check the photo to see why the extreme apertures are not recommended, but the sweet spot is f8-f11. Hope this helps! Also, you can check out my post processed images I've taken with this lens on my flickr account "k1ngkong" just in case Amazon doesn't allow my links below. [...] [...] [...] [...]
1-hop neighbor's text information: Another Winner from Nikon Note: See comments section for test photos. This review will be updated periodically as I use the lens more. Update 1 (6/3/2015): As I've now used it for half a year, I have added some of the breathtaking photos this lens has allowed me to capture (all shot at f/1.8). One additional thing I've noticed concerns the focus. Although I don't classify it as a con, I have found that the optimal focus of the lens changes at different temperatures. A lot of the photo work I do involves cold conditions (usually 0 C), and I have found that if I correctly focus the camera at infinity at room temperature, the lens will go slightly out of focus when I bring my camera+lens down to freezing temperatures. Presumably this is due to the glass or barrel contracting. The effect is definitely noticeable on Nikon's full frame 36 MP-class sensors (i.e. D800-series), and still noticeable on 12 MP full frame sensors. The easy solution is to cool your camera down before focusing it, which when I did it gave me consistently excellent, sharp results. However I want to emphasize this effect is normal and expected, and is NOT a design flaw. Introduction: ---------------- This lens was a bit of a surprise announcement for me back in September, and as soon as I saw it I knew it would be great for astrophotography, and anything in general that needs a wide field of view coupled with a shallow depth of field. I had briefly considered the Nikon 28mm f/1.8G lens, but I decided its optics wasn't good enough for my purposes (namely, focus shift, and a donut shaped area where the image resolution was unusually better). In retrospect I'm glad I held back on that and waited long enough to purchase this one. I have used the old AF 20mm f/2.8D before, and the one time I was using it for a night sky shoot, the coma was so horrible I had to crop it out of the final image. With this new, updated lens, Nikon has brought the 20mm f/2.8D into the modern era. Being a 20mm lens with a max aperture of 1.8 meant that one would not have to pay the high premium for a wide angle f/1.4 lens (i.e., 24 f/1.4G and 35 f/1.4G, and the much rarer 28mm f/1.4D), which in my opinion isn't really worth it. With this 20mm f/1.8G lens the "bang-for-buck" ratio is quite good, despite with a price a little on the high end of the 1.8G series. The extra 2/3 stop one would gain from f/1.8 to f/1.4 for another ~$1000 dollars isn't worth it for me, I'd rather just bump up the ISO by 2/3 of a stop if necessary. One critical advantage I see with this lens is the ability to use filters attached to the front. I love using my 14-24 when it comes to ultra-wide angle landscape shots, but as many point out it was not designed to be used with filters. The only filter system designed to work with it costs more than $250 (the WonderPana). With this new 20mm f/1.8G, now I can use all of the 77mm size filters I have for my f/2.8 zooms. This is an immense advantage I see especially among nature and landscape photographers. There are many possibilities with this 20mm f/1.8 lens - it is great for astrophotography where capturing both the landscape and night sky requires a wide angle lens. The large aperture also offers a great way to increase the separation between subject and background (or foreground). A big plus for this lens is the relatively extreme minimum focus distance of 7.8 inches *from the sensor plane.* This means you can practically shove the lens right up to your subject and still be in focus! This would also be a perfect lens for events, especially for cases where the venue is dark and you want to capture the entire crowd in one shot. As with any lens I purchase, the first thing I do is put it through some tests. I only do this to discover both the strong and weak points of the lens so that I have a better idea of how to use the lens. I don't shoot test charts all day (I actually don't have one, more below), the purpose of my tests is to determine the best ways of using the lens while minimizing its weak spots. Ergonomics: ----------------- - Weight: The lens is surprisingly light! When I first took it out of the box, it almost felt like a plastic toy. I was actually tempted to juggle with it, just kidding. This isn't to say its light weight is a bad thing; in fact it's a tad lighter than the Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G. I own the awesome 14-24 lens as well which is at least a couple times heavier than this lens. So if I know I need to travel light, and need a wide angle fast lens, the 20mm f/1.8G fits the bill exactly. I can understand how some people subconsciously (or consciously) associate weight with quality, but despite its light weight it can suck in a lot of light, and have a wide field of view. This is mostly due to the reinforced plastic used throughout the construction of the lens. The only possible issue here is if people are more used to balanced camera body + lens combinations (i.e. the 14-24), this 20 f/1.8 will naturally shift the weight to be supported by your right hand more. - Focus ring: The focus ring is just the right size for me, approximately 2cm wide. The focusing is mostly smooth on my copy, and is damped for fine focusing. That is to say, as you're turning the focus ring, the focus distance turns at a slower rate than your fingers. This makes it easier to finely tune focus, especially when manual focusing for astrophotography. The focusing ring has a total throw distance of ~90 degrees from minimum focus to just past infinity focus. There aren't too many focus distances marked, only at 0.2m, 0.25m, 0.4m, and infinity. - Other: The front of the lens has a small flute that makes it easier to hold (at least for me). The M/A - M switch is the same as on other lenses and located at the same place. The focus distance indicator has distances in meters and ft., but are spaced closer than most of my other lenses. The front element is quite bulbous in fact, and so is the rear element so be careful when mounting or unmounting. The white mounting index dot is larger than usual, and makes it easier to switch lenses in the dark. Performance: ------------------ - Resolution: The lens is an amazing performer when it comes to image quality, given its size, weight, and large aperture. Wide open the resolution decreases slowly from the center to about 3/4 of the image circle (3/4 the way from center to the corner), where it starts to degrade at a faster rate. The microcontrast (i.e. 10 l/mm on MTF charts) is very well maintained out to the corners (as opposed to older lenses), but acutence (i.e. 30 l/mm on MTF charts) decreases noticeably at the last 1/4 interval. Fortunately microcontrast can be boosted in post processing, if it is needed. Compared to the 14-24 at 20mm and f/2.8, this lens is comparable, although definitely softer at f/1.8. This is of course normal, but hopefully it provides a good comparison of where the image quality stands. Overall it is superb, and over most of the frame the details are punchy with nice contrast. The lens copy I got had no decentering issues at infinity (left and right side were simultaneously in focus), and as far as I can tell no issues with focus shift, when focused at infinity. Briefly for anyone interested, for the infinity focus performance tests I used a D800 body on a tripod, with my test subject being a row of buildings very far away (~0.5 mi) with a lot of small details. Image resolution was determined by manually focusing at 100% live view, and also using contrast detect AF. What a lot of people don't realize is that image resolution can vary between different focus distances. So in this light I also briefly tested the lens resolution very close to the minimum focus distance of ~10 inches. Note this is a brief test, so I only used the phase detect AF to focus. I found the resolution to decrease just a tiny, but noticeable amount. Again this is preliminary since I didn't manually focus it. - Coma: This is a type of optical aberration that affects very small distant points of light (i.e. stars, distant street lights). The aberration is worse the farther it is from the image center, in this case the corners, and manifests itself as bright wings around the point sources of light oriented towards the center of the image. Since astrophotography usually involves stars in the night sky, it was an important attribute for me when deciding if the lens was right for me. Overall, the coma performance of this lens was excellent. Stars in the night sky retain their point like structures for the most part, however the brightest stars did exhibit faint wings around them when magnified to 100%. This amount is negligible even for very large prints (i.e., 30" x 50" prints). By comparing images on the 20mm at f/1.8 to shots taken using the 14-24mm (another lens with very good coma performance), both lenses exhibited about the same level of coma at roughly the same aperture (f/2.8 on the 14-24mm, f/2.5 on the 20mm). So if you are an astrophotographer, and are concerned about coma performance, buy this lens with confidence. Although coma on stars look great, if you have distant lights in your shots, the coma will appear much worse just like on the 14-24. On the 20mm lens at f/1.8, the coma wings are approximately 1.5X the lengths of coma wings on the 14-24mm at 20mm and f/2.8 aperture. ***See comments section for links to test photos.*** So if you are doing night city shots for example, be sure to stop down to f/4 to completely minimize coma. However if you are doing night sky shots, the coma performance at f/1.8 is quite good and won't be noticed. This shouldn't be an issue most of the time, since I would most likely have a tripod with me if doing night cityscapes. If I didn't have a tripod and was forced to use this lens at f/1.8, I'd much rather have a bit of coma in my image than no image. - Autofocus: The autofocus for this lens is quite typical for the 1.8G line of lenses. It isn't super fast like Nikon's premium f/2.8 zooms, but it isn't a slouch either. The relatively short focus throw distance helps in reducing the seek time for the AF-S motor. In fact the AF sound reminds me of the AF unit on the Nikkor 16-85mm DX lens I also own. Focus breathing is another aspect important more for cinematographers, and the general characteristic is the focal length increases by approximately 1-2mm the closer the lens is focused. Focusing is internal so polarizers can be used without any problems, with the rear element becoming more recessed the closer one focuses. The minimum focus distance on this lens is ridiculously close - I measured approximately 6cm from the subject to the front lens element (the working distance). Objects at this range appear quite distorted naturally, with the background blur being very pleasing to look at. The bokeh is quite pleasing to my eye at least, with out of focus highlights at f/1.8 and minimum focus distance being mostly circular and not very nervous. At smaller apertures the 7 bladed diaphragm shape can be seen in the out of focus highlights. Finally, on my particular copy I found that it was consistently back focusing. No problem, I dialed in an AF fine tune of -7 on my D800, and -12 on my D700. After calibrating the AF the lens was consistently hitting the correct focus at all focal distances (infinity to minimum focus distance). Interestingly enough, the focus was perfect on my wife's D5000 (which doesn't have AF fine tune). - Flares and ghosting: I'm amazed that this wide angle lens has produced very little flares in any photos I've taken so far. The lens resists flares a lot better than a lot of wide angle lenses though. In my experience with the lens, I got flaring with very bright lights at night from car headlights. It's impossible to design a lens that would not produce flares under any conditions, but this is the next best thing anyone can ask for. The lens has the nano crystal coating which apparently reduces the amount of flares seen when shooting into strong light (i.e. the Sun). I haven't noticed any ghosting yet in real shooting conditions yet. - Color aberrations: I have noticed a bit of purple fringing at harsh contrast edges (i.e. a sharp edge between white and black) at larger apertures. However by f/2.5 they mostly go away, and are irrelevant by f/4. However this can be easily rectified in post production, or one can stop down to a smaller aperture. - Vignetting: The vignetting was surprisingly less than I expected. Compared to the 14-24 at f/2.8 the vignetting is stronger on the 20mm f/1.8, but not by that much more. Fortunately though vignetting can be corrected in post production as well, and in fact some people see it more as a feature. By f/2.8 most of the vignetting is gone, and by f/4 it is field irrelevant. - Distortion: This is another department the lens is nothing short of amazing. The amount of distortion is very low compared to other (ultra-) wide angle lenses. Unless you are doing architectural photography (which is one application of this lens), distortion correction is not needed and straight lines look very straight and pleasing. Conclusions: ------------------ Pros: + Excellent price to performance ratio compared to Nikon's other wide angle primes (i.e. 24 f/1.4G) + Very light weight, a tad lighter than the 50mm f/1.4G lens. + Image resolution is quite sharp at f/1.8 and infinity focus, it is softer than the 14-24 at 20mm and f/2.8 but not by a whole lot. + Coma performance for stars is excellent - See links posted in the comments section of this review. + 77mm filter thread lets me use my existing filters at an ultra-wide focal length, which is a huge advantage over the 14-24. + Autofocus is decently fast, not as fast as the f/2.8 zooms, but still good. + Extremely close minimum focus distance, with a working distance (subject to front of lens) of ~6 cm. + Focus ring is damped, good for manual fine tuning of focus. + No focus shift apparent when focused at infinity. + Bokeh at f/1.8 is quite pleasing, out of focus highlights appear round without much outlining. + Large white mounting index on lens makes it easier to switch lenses in the dark. + (So far) I've seen no flares or ghosting in any images. + Vignetting is very decent, only a little bit darker than the 14-24 at f/2.8. + Distortion levels are amazingly low, and irrelevant in the field (except maybe architecture photography). This can be corrected in post production anyway if needed, just like most other lenses. + Flaring is present in very strong lighting (i.e. headlights at night), but is on par or better than most wide angle lenses. + No ghosting seen any images. Cons: - Light weight lens may be harder to balance on pro bodies. - Coma of bright point sources (i.e. distant street lamps) are very apparent, although similar to the 14-24. At f/1.8 the length of the coma wing is about 1.5 times longer than the coma wings in the 14-24 at 20mm and f/2.8. At about f/2.8 on both lenses the coma is nearly identical in size. See links posted to coma test shots in the comments section of this review. - Purple fringing is apparent at apertures larger than f/2.8, however they can be corrected in post production, or one can stop down to f/2.8 or smaller to get rid of it. - It is not nearly as weather sealed as Nikon's "professional" line up of lenses (i.e. the f/2.8 zooms), although it does have a rear rubber gasket.
1-hop neighbor's text information: A great cost effective manual lens. There aren't many reviews on this lens so I thought I'd step in. This is a manual lens so you need to know how to use your camera in manual mode (or watch like 3 YouTube videos). You have a dslr so you should really be working towards understanding how the thing actually works anyway or you could've saved yourself some money/trouble and got an olloclip for your phone. Long story short: I am a beginner and even I can get this lens to give me sharp images and video. Camera : Nikon d5100
Target text information: Samyang SY8M-P 8mm works fine when it is set up properly Purchased from Amazon. Received in two days. Would not reach infinity focus, called Amazon received replacement in two days. Second lens would not focus at infinity. Focusing on the two lens were at different distant marking for the same object, Since I bought the lens for full sky astrophotography, infinity was a must. Not wanting to ask for a third lens and reading about this problem many times on the internet, I rolled back the rubber ring to expose the the 3 screws that lets you adjust the location of the distance marks, loosened the screws moved the ring until I could get a sharp infinity focus at hard stop, rolled back the rubber and the lens works fine. Great lens once everything is corrected. Great for landscapes and sharp when cropped. Five stars if Samyang sends lenses out adjusted correctly. Hank
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
10
|
Lenses
|
photo
| 19,367
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: You will get a different product made by Vivitar. BUYER BEWARE.! DO NOT BUY FROM ACCESSORY GENIE! MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENT FOR THIS PRODUCT! What you will receive is a Vivitar brand wrist strap that looks different than the DUALGRIP advertised here. Even when you complain about it being the wrong product they will swear up and down that it is the correct product shipped explaining that it's the same brand, but different labeling. If you don't mind the Vivitar version, you can most likely find it elsewhere for $5 less!!! Again, do not give Accessory Genie your business. You will most certainly regret it.
Target text information: it ok it works. low quality i had to saw off a little plastic piece so it worked properly.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
8
|
Digital Cameras
|
photo
| 20,832
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Nikon A30 I compared these to the Nikon 10x42 binocs side by side for quite awhile before deciding, and found the clarity and light transfer to be darn near the same. I chose these. At less than half the weight, and significantly cheaper. These are great "upper-end of the low cost" binoculars. VASTLY better than the similarly sized simmons and bushnell variety's I have tried, that only last a year of average hunting use before they start "seeing double", or an eyepiece falls off. So far they have proven excellent for hunting. Good light transfer, sharpness, and light weight, and no fogging. For sub-$70 binocs, these are hard to beat.
1-hop neighbor's text information: ... SPECTACULAR! ... Bigger than life. ... SPECTACULAR!! ... Perhaps because we live on Kauai and the colors here are are rich and lush... but these Polaris Optics make the world appear like a Hollywood Movie... From my door I can view the mountains and it almost feels like I'm right there standing in the foliage. I shopped for this particular 8X42 model because they are easy to hold for long periods without arm stress. The bonus with this model is they are waterproof and fog proof. Can't beat that with a stick. Glad I bought 'em. (I posted a picture of the view from my front door)
1-hop neighbor's text information: A Comparative Analysis of Leading Binoculars After years of suffering with dark, weak, wobbly binoculars (thank you, Magnacraft), I found myself needing two types: the best quality I could find (1) at any weight but under $250 for use within a drive of home (home binocs), and (2) under 10 oz, easy to travel with in tour groups, simple for impatient family members, and ideal for night concerts and day baseball games (travel binocs). After studying reviews and comments thoroughly, I concluded there are brilliant experts commenting regularly on Amazon - much more insightful than the professional reviewers who focus on expensive, heavy devices purchased by others of their ilk. From my fellow consumers' insights, I purchased 11 binoculars with at least 70% five-star ratings that fit my general specifications for home or travel. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS. After exhaustive examination - reading a DVD box at 46 feet, finding individual cattle from a moving minivan, and watching stars and planets in my backyard - I concluded the essential attributes for binoculars across categories are: (A) Plenty of Light brought to your eye. Light is determined by the diameter of the light-gathering lens divided by the magnification. In other words, an 8x42 pair has a ratio of 5.25 and produces LOTS of light, while a 10x21 pair has a ratio of 2.1 and always appear dark. Conclusion: About 3.0 is adequate and the best available for compact binoculars. (B) Good Stability of View. View stability depends on (i) the degrees of field of vision (can you find what you are looking for), (ii) the depth of visibility (do you have to refocus for every few feet of depth), and (iii) wobble (which is itself determined by (i) and (ii)). Conclusion: field of vision is rarely as broad as advertised, depth of visibility depends on the lens quality and you just have to check it out, and any binoc with a magnification of 10 or higher proved to have poor stability of view without a tripod, at least for me. There is a big difference between 8x and 10x, particularly below a 42 lens diameter. SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS. (Home Binoculars) The best Home Binoc was the Nikon Monarch ATM 8x42, and it outperformed all other 10 by a wide margin. I could read a DVD box at 46 feet, keep a broad and stable view to find the cow with three white spots while bouncing in a minivan, and find and watch Mars. At 24 oz, it's too big for constant lugging, but oh what a treat. At $230, it was comparable in price to the Vixen 14502 Foresta 8x42 and the Bushnell Ultra HD 8x42, but it performed noticeably better, particularly on view stability. Several cheaper, heavy models under $100 had cloudy lens. (Travel Binoculars) The Pentax 8x25 UCF XII and the Olympus 8x25 PCI were best in class, although the Pentax had less wobble, more clarity while the Olympus provided more light and more accurate color tones, but a smaller field of vision. (Forget finding the cow, but if you found it, you could count its ear hairs at dusk). Both were 10 oz, and about $65; the Pentax, which gets slightly better overall reviews, is larger but felt better in my hand. Small hands, viewing at dusk, standing still = Olympus. Larger hands, viewing in daylight, on a bus = Pentax. Lastly, the itty bitty Olympus 7x21 PC III at 7 oz in metallic blue is adorable and $24 (refurbished), with fantastic clarity and ease of use, but a very narrow field of vision, despite its 7.5% claim. So what did we do? I decided to travel with the heavy Nikon Monarch, but kept the Pentax 8x25 in reserve. Different members of my family preferred the Pentax 8x25, the Olympus 8x25, and the Olympus 7x21, each predictably on the basis of the decision maker's age, size, and goals. None showed any interest in the other six binocs. As a final note, Beware of imperfection and non-Amazon sellers. Two of the 11 binocs arrived with lens imperfections. The heavy Bushnell Falcon (7x36) at $30 had a cloudy lens, and Amazon accepted the return promptly. The lightweight but expensive Nikon Travelite 10x25, already with little light and a small field of vision, had a defective lens, making it darker. The vendor wanted me to pay shipping in both directions plus a restocking fee to return the defective item. Good luck with your decision. I hope my odyssey was helpful to you.
Target text information: The Plossl eyepieces work much better than the original eyepieces that came with my Bushnell ... The Plossl eyepieces work much better than the original eyepieces that came with my Bushnell telescope. I enjoy the telescope now as it was unusable with original eyepieces.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
2
|
Binoculars & Scopes
|
photo
| 22,348
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Didn't work for me. I was looking for a pad to use with a new bag I purchased for work - the strap is only an inch wide, so it was really digging into my shoulder. I can see how the ErgoPad would work in some situations, but it really didn't work for me when wearing the bag cross-body - instead, the angled design just dug further into my shoulder, even though I tried wearing it in both directions. Also, there isn't much 'pad' to this pad - it's really more of a rubber wedge that doesn't provide any cushioning.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Depending on what material you are wearing, the strap ... Depending on what material you are wearing, the strap wlll stay on shoulder. A slick material - the strap will not stay on shoulder
1-hop neighbor's text information: Painful with just a shirt I purchased the 2" ErgoPad to use on a camera bag (three lenses, one body, flash, etc.). The reviews look good, so I thought I would give it a try. The bottom side of the ErgoPad has a field of small raised circles. The good news is that the pad did not slip off my shoulder, the bad is they dug into my shoulder. I would expect that the pad would be great with a medium jacket, but definitely not with a Polo shirt. I will be taking the ErgoPad off the bag, and reinstall the original padded strap.
Target text information: Ergopad 1 1/2" Shouler Strap I love the product. I already have a wider strap and loved it. So, when I needed a smaller strap I knew where to go. It keeps the cross body purse I use it on in place.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
5
|
Bags & Cases
|
photo
| 36,654
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Four Stars a little lighter in color than appears on my calibrated screen, but just what I was looking for!
1-hop neighbor's text information: I love Savage paper! Beautiful color in person! I have many colors of Savage paper, they always photograph beautifully and are easy to use if you have a proper set up for them (they are heavy!). Roll arrived on time and free of any rips or creases. Just perfect.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Quality product - happy with my purchage. Excellent quality. Color as described. It's quite big (long)! Seems sturdy and like it will last if I don't tear it accidentally. Using it for backdrop in YouTube videos.
Target text information: Happy with this Very clean, very heavy paper. No problems with it at all, except for getting the tape off the rolled up paper. This has photographed beautifully. The swatch on amazon is true to color as well. The delivery and packaging were both very satisfactory!
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
4
|
Lighting & Studio
|
photo
| 8,901
|
train
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: A Good Option If You Are On A Budget The Olympus 40-150mm is a good option if you are on a budget and the lens is on sale as it often can be. At the list price of $199, I feel there are better options like the Panasonic 45-150mm which sells for $220-$260. The Panasonic offers a more compact body being 1 cm shorter, a metal lens mount compared to the plastic mount on the Olympus, and more durable lens barrel compared the very plasticy feel of the Olympus. If you are shooting with a Panasonic camera the Panasonic 45-150mm lens is a no brainer because it offers image stabilization whereas the Olympus 40-150mm does not since the stabilization is in the body. Even if the Olympus was on sale for $150 and you were a Panasonic shooter I think it would be best to spend the extra $80 to get the Panasonic zoom over the Olympus. The Olympus 40-150mm does produce surprising sharp images for such an inexpensive lens. The sweetest spots are focal lengths between 40-70mm. The image quality sees a fall off at 150mm which is fairly common for telephoto zooms. The image quality between the Panasonic 45-150mm and the Olympus 40-150mm are very similar. The only real advantage the Olympus offers over the Panasonic is at 150mm when shooting at infinity. The Panasonic images are soft whereas the Olympus images are still pretty good. This is a solid performing lens for the price. If you are looking to purchase this lens I'd wait for a sale since there are other, better options out there. I've seen this lens as low as $99 which is a fantastic price for what you get regardless if you are shooting Olympus or Panasonic.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Very feminine and extremely practica. This bag is just what I was looking for. I got a Nikon D3200 with 2 lenses for Christmas and was having a hard time finding a bag that was inexpensive and small as well as a bag that does not scream "I'm a tourist!" It is very feminine and extremely practical at the same time. My only suggestion would be, since a camera set can be heavier than a regular kick one carries, to make the strap wider or place a comfortable insert for the shoulder. Other than that, perfect camera bag.
Target text information: Exceptional bag--feminine and functional! I received this as a gift, and it's a keeper! No one would guess it is a camera bag. It is very lightweight, compact, and versatile. It looks like an enhanced linen type fabric--it's not plastic-like, it's fully lined, and resists dirt. I've had it for 2 years and it shows no signs of wear. Inside it has a padded, removable insert that has adjustable panels. I fit the following in it: an Olympus OM-D E-M1 facing down with 12-40 Pro lens attached (I like to be able to grab and shoot), a 75-300, or a couple of smaller lenses, filters, a spare battery, a compact, lipstick, gum, eyeglass case, keys, a alumina wallet, my iPhone, and a few other things. There is a full length pocket along the outside back for papers, phone, etc. It holds a nice shape even when packed with the aforementioned. Dimensions: 10"w x 5.25"d x 8.5h (where it folds at the strap attachments) and 12"h as shown in product photo. The insert takes up about an inch in depth, it is 4.5"h. The back pocket is 7"d and extends the full width. I usually wear it cross body with the top part folded over so the handles face out. It's still easy to reach in and grab the cam, or change lenses discreetly. It's great for travel as it folds flat if you want to pack it. I usually carry it loaded and folded over in my under-seat bag. If Olympus ever makes it in a darker color, I'd buy it in a second.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
5
|
Bags & Cases
|
photo
| 14,216
|
val
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Not as Advertised I just got this frame and it's nothing like in the picture above, I'm very disappointed. I'll try to include real pictures in "share your own pictures" section. Made of plastic, with rounded edges, it looks very cheap, almost like a toy. The screen resolution is not 800x480 as described in the other review, it's actually 480x234. I regularly buy stuff from Amazon, and this is the first time that a product was falsely advertised.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Just what my wife was looking for My wife has been wanting a digital photo frame for a while now, but I have been skeptical about getting one because I have heard a lot of negative things about them. Well I read through tons of reviews for different models and types on amazon, there are quite a few that have some really bad feedback. I decided to give this one a try because it has some decent reviews and a few mixed ones. I was nervous about it because it was a gift for my wife and I wanted it to be a good one and not something she was going to hate, which is never good( happy wife = happy life ) . When it arrived I was pleasantly surprised with the quality of the materials and workmanship of the frame . I will be honest I am pretty tech savy, but once I loaded the pics onto the frame via a thumb drive it took me a little while to figure out how to rotate the pics, crop the pics, and save them to the memory on the frame itself. Once I played around with it for a few.minutes to learn how the system works it was a breeze. The only downside I would like to.mention is the instructions that come with it are not very clear, be patient with it and learn the functions of the buttons and it will make sense. Please look at my pictures I posted it shows the buttons and the card slot & usb slot. Also the wedding picture shown is roughly 40yrs ago and it shows up pretty darn good on the screen for an old picture that was scanned into a computer. The customer service is pretty darn good, I asked a couple questions and they responded within 24 hrs which is fair these days considering time zone differences. Sample received for an honest and unbiased opinion and review. These words are my opinion 100%
1-hop neighbor's text information: Easy to use, attention-getting looks. Great for the price! TL;DR: The motion detector is a blessing in that it will keep the electronics from overheating, and even people who are around technology all day long will take notice of the stylish device you have sitting on your desk. If you don't need WiFi, and want a modest digital picture frame (or several!), you could do much worse than the X08E. DISCLAIMER: I paid full price for this frame, based on my purchasing and decision-making skills, and my need for a great digital picture frame. [...] There's something about this frame, such that as soon as you unbox it, you realize that it's slick and special somehow. From the breezy and well-designed GUI menu system, to the basic good looks, and almost "polished" appearing screen, this motion-aware picture frame does not disappoint (except perhaps in one arearead below). Since nearly all digital picture frames are the same, I won't bore you with the details, lest to say that this frames does NOT support WiFi (meaning it's affordable), so your choices for image hoisting are SD card and USB "stick", with the quote marks included as the angle of the rear frame bracket means that only the tiny "nub" style USB drives will work in this model. The box doesn't actually mention USB support, so rest assured that the port is there and functional (life hacking tip: you should actually be able to charge your iPhone with this frame!). There is one confusing item in the menu system that warrants explaining. The setting for the motion control itself is pretty confusingly worded, so just know that as long as you avoid "Disable" (which mysteriously turns the feature off) you'll be okay. Translated, the other numbers are just how long it waits after you've left the room before the frame shuts off. The CPU in this frame is fast, so the transitions look great, and it plays video with sound. CONS: The Achilles Heel of this frame is animated GIFs. While the format is supported, and it does try to play them, they crash your frame, so be sure to filter these out before trying to play a slide show. The battery in the remote will likely be dead on arrival, so while the remote is actually quite cool, be prepared to spend a few extra dollars on a CR2025 battery (you may want to order one when you buy the frame) if you want to use it. Considering the frame's control panel is in the back, facing straight up, you'll want to use the remote.
Target text information: Delightful Digital Photoframe While Coby may not be a premium brand when it comes to electronics, I have purchased quite a few of these units and so far so good. This is a nice versatile photoframe and will run smoothly throughout the day, if you have placed it on your desk at the office. What's Included: - Photoframe - Kickstand - Power Adapter - Manual Specifications: - Display size: 7" widescreen TFT LCD (approx. 3.5" h x 6" w) - File Format: JPEG only - Resolution: 480 x 234 pixels - Functionality: Calendar and Clock with Alarm timer - Mode: Photo Slideshow / Browser - Display Functions: Rotate / Zoom - Card Slots: SD, MMC, MS - USB Ports: Full size and Mini 5-pin - Built-in Memory: 1 MB - Mounting: Wall Mountable with detachable stand - Power consumption: <= 3.5 watts This photoframe allows you to customize the way your pictures are displayed, here are the items that can be adjusted: - Display ratio - Slideshow duration - Slideshow repeat - Slideshow transition effects The operation of this photoframe is as easy as a snap. Just stick in either a Flash Drive or a Memory card with your JPEG files and you are all set to go. In my opinion this will make a great gift.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
4
|
Lighting & Studio
|
photo
| 5,086
|
test
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: It's True -- Fuji Film IS Superior ...and not just the 400 film. The 100 and 200 films are excellent too! I had two rolls of film with me on an outing at one of Long Island's beatiful bays and inlets. One was Kodak and the other was Fuji. I took pictures of pretty much the same things: of boats docked or out sailing, of inlet scenery (green plants hanging over the water), etc. When I got the pictures back, Kodak was okay, but the ones that were taken with Fuji film were absolutely stunning. The pictures were crisp with vibrant colors. One of my favorite pictures was a picture of a sailing boat docked at a private area, with trees and plants framed around it. The greens in the trees and plants were truly every hue of green you would expect had you been there and so were the various murky shades of blue in the water and the contrasting white of the boat. The ashy shades of the dock itself were picked up nicely and the browns of the trees' bark can be clearly seen, making a nice foil for all the green shades in the plants. I loved it so much that I had it enlarged to poster size. Fuji film has been the only film I use since then. I have yet to try the 800 film, but having read the review on it from here, as well as having my own good experiences with Fuji film, I have no doubt that it would please me as well!
1-hop neighbor's text information: Expired, but still some of the best multipurpose color film ever. I dislike penalizing a product because of a vendor, so I am reviewing only the film. I like the high range of the tones in Superia fim, and I love the perfect adaptability of this 200 speed film. Honestly, I can shoot it as if it is 100 or 400 without any problems at all; I just pay attention to my highlights and shadows and zone them in. The film gets five stars, but it is no longer made with the HQ label: it is known simply as Fuji Superia 200. That means any film you see with this label is out of date. I am not penalizing the vendor because I was aware of this and wanted this film because I have loved it so much and the newer film is not quite the same. I would say just be aware. If you have a problem with expired film or you do not shoot much film, this is not for you. If you are realize that film does not just go bad on its expiry date and this film has obviously been well-kept, then you should be okay with the caveat that it *is old film* so you may lose your shots or get unexpected results. Being informed is the best plan. If you get a box that has the expiration date removed like I did and the film does not work out I would say you should be eligible for a refund. In my case, I got the same outstanding results with this film that I expected.
1-hop neighbor's text information: Great little camera, packs quite a punch I bought the Stylus 120 right before taking a month long trip to Europe over the summer, and I have yet to see a single thing wrong with it. It takes GREAT pictures, and it is quite resilient. I dropped it a couple of times,it was constantly banged around, and yet it always functioned faithfully. The only thing that I can complain about was completly my fault: the manual focus got knocked around when I wasn't paying attention, and so a couple of pictures were out of focus. I would HIGHLY recommend this camera to both amateurs (I never even read the directions, the camera is that simple) and pros alike.
Target text information: Excellent all-around point and shoot camera I like this camera for its all around versatility and picture quality. I've used it in work, for art and for family fun--and it's a good choice for all. The camera is small, light and easy to use on the job. I photo houses for insurance inspections. The zoom helps getting close ups, and the 28 mm wide angle is great for shooting the entire house--I don't have to move very far away. Likewise for landscape photos, sunsets, etc. The flash is very versatile, and can be turned off (with only a little trouble) to save batteries when not needed. The red-eye reduction helps a lot for family shots. This new version is missing the very useful date/time stamp--present on the older model I use. The picture quality is probably not that of a professional SLR, but pretty close for most of the things I shoot. The camera seems quite durable. I used it for 2 years occasionally for fun and art, and recently put it into professional service. It held up for 10 months with daily use--25-40 photos and being turned on and off 10-15 times per day--before it broke down. I also dropped it several times, but it kept on ticking. It will probably last you a few more years, if you just use it for a family camera!
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
9
|
Film Photography
|
photo
| 147
|
test
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: A Must-Have for Nikon CLS Enthusiasts Several years ago, Nikon created the "Speed of Light" DVD, featuring Joe McNally demonstrating the (then) new SB-800 speedlight. Nikon missed an opportunity to create a true educational resource in its quest to quickly highlight the features of its flagship speedlight. Not this time. Roughly five times as long as the "Speed of Light" DVD, "Hands-On" is a Nikon flash seminar in a box, chock full of highly detailed information. Photographers Bob Krist and Joe McNally start you in the studio with the basics and then hit the road for some high-end location shooting. They walk you through both the theory and practice in detail -- you will walk away with a thorough understanding of how to use what is widely considered to be the best flash system in the industry. They go from simple, one-light setups to a tour de force *13-light* shoot at dusk. The DVD is suitable for all levels, from absolute beginner to long-time CLS users looking for fresh ideas. You will watch this one more than once, and it will influence the way you light for years to come. Highly recommended for Strobist-style lighting, it is the best resource to date for learning Nikon's Creative Lighting System. David Hobby Columbia, MD
Target text information: Solid reference product -- good for understanding using CLS Good overview of how to finally master the Nikon Creative Lighting System. Only knock on this is that spends a fair amount of time on the SB900 capabilities -- so for those of us who aren't spending that kind of dough and have the SB600 several of the menu elements don't come into play. Also uses several physical setups that are beyond what an amateur photographer would normally have.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
1
|
Accessories
|
photo
| 3,607
|
test
|
1-hop neighbor's text information: Very small, but good for a simplistic, mini tripod. For what it is, I think it is a pretty good tripod for the price. It isn't meant to be the most versatile tripod out there, just good enough to hold your camera for stills or a small webcam. Adjusting this is pretty easy and it lucks and unlocks its position with just the turn of the latch on the side. This tripod was a lot smaller than I was expecting it to be so its nice for traveling or where you have to set up in a small place. Since it isn't the biggest tripod, make sure everything is balanced before you walk away from your setup. You don't need your nice camera falling over.
Target text information: Junk -- literally broke 1 minute after taking from the package. I bought three of these sight unseen, on speculation. While they are nice and small and relatively inexpensive they are also unbelievable cheaply made. One of the units had a leg snap off the very first time I tried to twist/deploy the leg, seconds after pulling it from the package. The "axel" around which the leg pivots is only a tapered screw (like a wood screw) screwed from the opposite side and into the plastic of leg. Thankfully the price was too inexpensive to really bother returning it. Ya gets what ya pay for.
I provide the content of the target node and its neighbors' information. The relation between the target node and its 1-hop neighbors is 'co-purchase'. The 12 categories are:
0: Video Surveillance
1: Accessories
2: Binoculars & Scopes
3: Video
4: Lighting & Studio
5: Bags & Cases
6: Tripods & Monopods
7: Flashes
8: Digital Cameras
9: Film Photography
10: Lenses
11: Underwater Photography
Question: Based on the content of the target and neighbors' photo items, predict the category ID (0 to 11) for the target node.
|
6
|
Tripods & Monopods
|
photo
| 1,114
|
val
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 30