Papers
arxiv:2512.10952

Hierarchical Dataset Selection for High-Quality Data Sharing

Published on Dec 11
· Submitted by
Ismini Lourentzou
on Dec 17
Authors:
,
,
,

Abstract

A method called Dataset Selection via Hierarchies (DaSH) improves model performance by selecting entire datasets from a pool, outperforming existing baselines with fewer resources.

AI-generated summary

The success of modern machine learning hinges on access to high-quality training data. In many real-world scenarios, such as acquiring data from public repositories or sharing across institutions, data is naturally organized into discrete datasets that vary in relevance, quality, and utility. Selecting which repositories or institutions to search for useful datasets, and which datasets to incorporate into model training are therefore critical decisions, yet most existing methods select individual samples and treat all data as equally relevant, ignoring differences between datasets and their sources. In this work, we formalize the task of dataset selection: selecting entire datasets from a large, heterogeneous pool to improve downstream performance under resource constraints. We propose Dataset Selection via Hierarchies (DaSH), a dataset selection method that models utility at both dataset and group (e.g., collections, institutions) levels, enabling efficient generalization from limited observations. Across two public benchmarks (Digit-Five and DomainNet), DaSH outperforms state-of-the-art data selection baselines by up to 26.2% in accuracy, while requiring significantly fewer exploration steps. Ablations show DaSH is robust to low-resource settings and lack of relevant datasets, making it suitable for scalable and adaptive dataset selection in practical multi-source learning workflows.

Community

Paper submitter

How do you decide which datasets to train on when data comes from many noisy, heterogeneous sources? In this work, we formalize dataset selection as its own problem and introduce DaSH (Dataset Selection via Hierarchies), a method that models dataset-level utility and group-level utility.

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2512.10952 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2512.10952 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2512.10952 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 1