# Evaluation Guidelines ## 1. Selected Metrics ### 1.1 Correctness Combines elements of: - **coverage**: portion of vital information - as identified by a powerful LLM - in the ground truth answer which is covered by the generated answer. This metric is highly inspired by the work in [1]. - **relevance**: portion of the generated response which is directly addressing the question, regardless its factual correctness. Graded on a continuous scale with the following representative points: - **2:** Correct and relevant (no irrelevant information) - **1:** Correct but contains irrelevant information - **0:** No answer provided (abstention) - **-1:** Incorrect answer ### 1.2 Faithfulness Assesses whether the response is **grounded in the retrieved passages**. This metric reimplements the work discussed in [2]. Graded on a continuous scale with the following representative points: - **1:** Full support. All answer parts are grounded - **0:** Partial support. Not all answer parts are grounded - **-1:** No support. All answer parts are not grounded ### 1.3 Aggregation of Metrics Both **correctness** and **faithfulness** will contribute to the final evaluation score. ## 2. Manual and Automated Evaluation ### **2.1 First Stage:** - Automated evaluation by a state-of-the-art LLM, using **correctness** and **faithfulness** metrics to rank the participant teams. ### **2.2 Final Stage:** - **Manual evaluation** for the top-ranked submissions (e.g., **top 10 teams**) to determine winners. ## 3. Other Notable Points - Answer length is **unlimited** but only the first **300 words** will be evaluated. - Participants will submit (see Answer file [json schema](Answer_File.json.schema) and [example](Answer_File_Example.json)): - **The Question ID**. - **The Question**. - **The answer**. - **Supporting passages in decreasing order of importance, with their respective FinWeb doc-IDs**. - **The full prompt used for generation**. - Remarks: - Number of supporting passages is unlimited but only the first 10 will be considered by the Faithfulness metric. - We accept partial submissions where not all questions are answered These measures align the evaluation framework with the challenge's emphasis on **retrieval-augmented systems**. ## References [1] The Great Nugget Recall: Automating Fact Extraction and RAG Evaluation with Large Language Models. Ronak Pradeep, Nandan Thakur, Shivani Upadhyay, Daniel Campos, Nick Craswell, Jimmy Lin. TREC 2024 RAG Track [2] RAGAs: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation. Shahul Es, Jithin James, Luis Espinosa Anke, Steven Schockaert. EACL 2024